If you really want to understand this you will need to ask a lawyer. or start a discussen on talk-legal
to me it looks like some political game and splitting hairs about some of the CT details. Considering balrog-kun has a new account where CT is accepted and this declaration then all the data can be adopted by any mapper and declared odbl clean. all the bot edits are already declared odbl clean at http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quick_History_Service#Changeset_Overrides and my interpretation is that the whole user account can be adopted On Jan 13, 2012, at 2:07 PM, Mike N wrote: > On 1/13/2012 4:50 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: >> Speaking of, has anyone talked to balrog-kun yet? I know he was at >> one point insanely prolific and I often stumble across his data, he's >> currently a decliner. > > I don't have a clue what the below statement means, since he hasn't said > he'll make his edits Public Domain. > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/balrog-kun > > "All of my contributions* made through this account are ODbL-compatible. You > are free to use my contributions under the terms of either CC-By-SA or ODbL* > licenses at your preference, and you are free to sublicense my contributions > under ODbL 1.0 without attributing me other than as "OpenStreetMap > contributors"." > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us _______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
