On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:50:13 -0700, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
I propose replacing the PGS coastlines (largely imported by blars) in
Northwest Washington state with GeoBase coastlines. GeoBase data covers part
of NW Washington state (e.g. Canadian NHD area 08HAD00 covers the Washington
From: Wim Lewis [mailto:w...@.org]
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 11:27 PM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Proposed import: GeoBase Coastlines into
Northwest, Washington state
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:50:13 -0700, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com
wrote:
I propose
If you haven't seen it yet, good news! OSMF has indeed pushed the
database rebuild back a couple of days to begin on April 1st, instead
of the slightly insane (IMO) attempt to finish by April 1st.
http://blog.osmfoundation.org/2012/03/27/service-schedule-march-april-2012/
After the last thread I
On 3/28/2012 2:55 AM, Toby Murray wrote:
I've seen a little work being done
on interstates but so far it's been a drop in the bucket.
My logic is that data consumers will shut off their feed, so we won't
have instant chaos on Mapquest.com for example. After the license
change, any
I initially just sent this to Ian Dees, but maybe there are others on this list
that are thinking of doing this or could help.
Considering the upcoming license change and it's impact (many roads
that may become missing), I was thinking more about using TIGER 2011
to find roads that seem to be
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com wrote:
I initially just sent this to Ian Dees, but maybe there are others on this
list
that are thinking of doing this or could help.
Considering the upcoming license change and it's impact (many roads
that may become missing), I
I would hope that this is the same for the Great Lakes as well.
David.
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:27 AM, Wim Lewis w...@.org wrote:
On Sat, 24 Mar 2012 17:50:13 -0700, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
I propose replacing the PGS coastlines (largely imported by blars) in
Northwest
Hi all,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com wrote:
I initially just sent this to Ian Dees, but maybe there are others on
this list
that are thinking of doing this or could help.
Considering the
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Hi all,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:48 AM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:47 AM, Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com wrote:
Hardest part will then be scaling this up to all 3140 counties.
I'd love
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:15 AM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
On 3/28/2012 2:55 AM, Toby Murray wrote:
I've seen a little work being done
on interstates but so far it's been a drop in the bucket.
My logic is that data consumers will shut off their feed, so we won't have
instant chaos on
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
database rebuild back a couple of days to begin on April 1st, instead
of the slightly insane (IMO) attempt to finish by April 1st.
I already hear some complaints by OSM and data users about the short notice
- not
On 03/27/2012 07:15 PM, Kenneth Adelman wrote:
Btw, do these go into Mexico? I'm in Cozumel, and
surprised that I have map data.
You can see which tiles every individual file covers by looking at this
page:
http://daveh.dev.openstreetmap.org/garmin/Lambertus/latest/kml/kml.html
That would have to be a pretty elaborate set of PostGIS operations.
This is the OSM list, so we deal with OSM data here mainly (even though
TIGER is a primary data source for OSM in the US). There's several ways to
make OSM data routable. See for example http://project-osrm.org/ or
and to the list, sorry
-- Forwarded message --
From: Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org
Date: Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] PostGiS Queries
To: Hilton Long seldoms...@scinternet.net
Interesting. By eliminating too close nodes you mean generalization? That
There haven't been many 'OSM Moments' for me; you know, out of the blue,
you see one of your major map works in use in a completely unexpected
context. I actually had 2 of those moments in 2012 - where 2 unrelated
planning documents featured OSM maps which were much more detailed and
up to
15 matches
Mail list logo