On 4/12/2012 11:13 PM, James Mast wrote:
It seems that they are just starting a new way and connecting each
old node to the new way without at least moving the old node, which
means if Lar created the node and nobody has moved it since, it still
will get deleted and mess up the highway
* Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com [2012-04-12 15:52 -0400]:
On 4/12/2012 2:59 PM, Phil! Gold wrote:
* Minh Nguyenm...@1ec5.org [2012-04-12 10:06 -0700]:
There's an ALT I-75 that needs its own sequence file
I wouldn't necessarily oppose a separate network tag in this case, since
it's
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote:
* Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com [2012-04-12 16:03 -0400]:
Also I-270 Spur in Maryland, which *is* part of the Interstate
Highway System and thus belongs in network=US:I
First off, I still feel that there was a
I don't know who's doing that work in Columbia on the Interstates,
but they are doing it wrong unfortunately. While the ways aren't
tainted anymore, all of the nodes are still. Meaning that once
the bot gets unleashed, the highways will still get fucked-up. It
seems that they are just
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:27 AM, stevea stevea...@softworkers.com wrote:
I don't know who's doing that work in Columbia on the Interstates, but
they are doing it wrong unfortunately. While the ways aren't tainted
anymore, all of the nodes are still. Meaning that once the bot gets
unleashed,
Agreed. I am spending some cozy times with I65 in Alabama, next on my list
is US 78. Better late than never. Cleaning up lots of bridge trouble too
(missing grade separations).
For those interested, I identified ~12000 points of highway Trouble for the
US (here is the blog post -
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:27 AM, stevea stevea...@softworkers.com
wrote:
I don't know who's doing that work in Columbia on the Interstates, but
they are doing it wrong unfortunately. While the ways aren't tainted
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote:
I've been working in Seattle. An undecided (and probably long gone) mapper
touched a large segment of the area. Looking at CLEANMAP, Seattle looks
much better after hours of work by many people. However if every
On 4/13/2012 8:42 AM, Phil! Gold wrote:
First off, I still feel that there was a consensus last year on using the
network tag for distinct network subsets as well as for mainline roads and
you, despite being the only dissenter, continue to argue against something
the rest of community more or
Well guys, as far as I know, as long as the non-CT user didn't add any tags to
the node, all you have to do is move said node to a new coordinate and it
should then be considered un-tainted. That's what I was told and that's what
happens on the OSM Inspector. Plus, if you're using the
James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
Well guys, as far as I know, as long as the non-CT user didn't add any
tags to the node, all you have to do is move said node to a new
coordinate and it should then be considered un-tainted. That's what I
was told and that's what happens on the
11 matches
Mail list logo
