On 2012-11-27 8:55 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
there's a neighborhood in Rotterdam, NY where the signs for the side
streets along the main drag (Hamburg Street) are spelled out (e.g.,
Fourth Street)
but the signs interior to the neighborhood are abbreviated (e.g., 4th
Street.)
Along these lines,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote:
the rule we frequently follow is to use the format of the name on the sign
as
the guideline for what to put in the name tag for a way.
there's a neighborhood in Rotterdam, NY where the signs for the side
streets
Hi, one last personal note on the mapathon and a big thank you (literally)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/!i!/diary/18132
bye,
Matthias
Am 25.11.2012 15:37, schrieb Matthias Meißer:
Hi,
if we look at the current stats, 150 users joined the OPC2012 which
results in 300 active mappers in the
!i! wrote:
Hi, one last personal note on the mapathon and a big thank you
(literally): http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/!i!/diary/18132
And thank you, too. I've always been sceptical about this sort of event - my
vision for OSM is that we need more contributors with local knowledge, not
more
I'd like to ride on the coat tails of Richard's comments: Thank you Matthias
and anyone else who helped set this up. Super excited about such efforts as
they further deliniate great tasks for archair mapping and connecting local
with global communities.
On Nov 28, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Richard
Hi folks,
So SteveC's blog post sparked a bit of conversation today:
http://stevecoast.com/2012/11/28/openstreetmap-addressable/
I'd love to see OSM US lead the way on collecting high quality addressing
data from as many places as possible and throw it in to OSM. To that end I
started with this
On 11/28/12 6:35 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
Is anyone else interested in this? I could use some help gathering
volunteers to the cause.
i am working on leveraging things so that i can import enhanced 911
address data from NYS into OSM. this will probably happen as part of
my emergency response GPS
MassGIS has parcel data available in a license-ok manner, and I have
been thinking about it, but not getting to it.
An idea is to have a common schema or schemas for non-imported parcel
data in osm format. Then people can write converters for their
state/whatever and publish the data, and
On the MapRoulette subject, the connectivity challenge error count dropped
below 10,000 today, down from around 60,000 a mere four weeks ago.
This is really outstanding progress.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote:
I'd like to ride on the coat tails of Richard's
If it is feasible to have a (mostly) unified parcel schema, a MapRoulette
challenge can be created to task the conversion work to the community.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
MassGIS has parcel data available in a license-ok manner, and I have
been
the Old Topo Depot oldto...@novacell.com writes:
If it is feasible to have a (mostly) unified parcel schema, a MapRoulette
challenge can be created to task the conversion work to the community.
I was thinking about just having a node with an address which is the
centroid of the parcel, and
On 11/28/2012 6:35 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
Hi folks,
So SteveC's blog post sparked a bit of conversation today:
http://stevecoast.com/2012/11/28/openstreetmap-addressable/
I'd love to see OSM US lead the way on collecting high quality
addressing data from as many places as possible and throw it
A big thanks to Matthias and anyone else involved in setting things up -
this was a big result for the US. I chose that weekend to pay
attention to the 'Red headed stepchild' of the next county, and imported
newly constructed roads from TIGER, and got to some long-needed routing
fixes.
On 11/28/2012 8:10 PM, Jeff Meyer wrote:
Does anyone have any success stories of asking localities to open up
previously copyrighted data? I'm going down the just ask nicely for
*really* open data path here in Seattle, but have yet to hear back
from the authorities. It seems that having a list
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Brian May b...@mapwise.com wrote:
In the spreadsheet, would it make more sense to have the records by
county, and split out into cities where necessary? In Florida, its the
county govmts and county property appraisers that create / maintain parcels
and
No Salt Lake City? Meh. I have good contacts at the State GIS and they
are releasing state wide addresses Spring 2013. We're already on the
move here in the boondocks.
Martijn
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Brian May
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
No Salt Lake City? Meh. I have good contacts at the State GIS and they
are releasing state wide addresses Spring 2013. We're already on the
move here in the boondocks.
I only used these cities as a start: if you (or
Sorry, I should have made this clearer: I made the document read-only
because I didn't want griefers hopping in there. If you're interested in
helping at all please give me your e-mail address and I'll add you as an
editor.
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
18 matches
Mail list logo
