Brian May b...@mapwise.com writes:
I also think we need a little bit more sophisticated Data Catalog than
a google spreadsheet.
Email and a wiki page sounds good to me for coordination. Maybe we can
bring it up in a Mappy Hour as well. And if there's enough of a need,
we could do a
Interesting. How does parcel data work? What does it cover and what's the
data interesting for OSM in it? Is this about sourcing address data?
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 7:27 PM, Brian Cavagnolo bcavagn...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey guys,
In a previous thread on parcel data, some people expressed
[the following includes a message that Adam cc'd to the list that
probably got into the moderator queue]
On 2/22/13 9:03 AM, Adam Schreiber wrote:
On 2/21/13, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
i look forward to it. is there any particular mapping task i should look
for at
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
Brian May b...@mapwise.com writes:
I also think we need a little bit more sophisticated Data Catalog than
a google spreadsheet.
Email and a wiki page sounds good to me for coordination. Maybe we can
bring it up in a Mappy
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:01 AM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote:
Interesting. How does parcel data work? What does it cover and what's the
data interesting for OSM in it? Is this about sourcing address data?
Parcel data is interesting to OSM because it usually has addressing
information.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Brian Cavagnolo bcavagn...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey guys,
In a previous thread on parcel data, some people expressed interest in
participating in creating some sort of open repository for parcel
data. I was imagining a conference call or something to discuss next
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
I always find it boggling that open data projects are willing to use
google docs and google hangouts. It would be really nice to at least
have the data in a free software/free culture compatible place like an
OSM foundation
On 2/22/13 12:35 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
I always find it boggling that open data projects are willing to use
google docs and google hangouts. It would be really nice to at least
have the data in a free software/free culture
Richard,
I have been doing that in Southwestern parks that I have
visited recently (Mesa Verde, Malpais Notional Monument).
Usually I do the foot trails in the conventional manner,
usually with a name, such as Far View House Trail. For each point
of interest, I tag it as
Hello all,
I mentioned a few months back that there are several places, particularly
fere in the midwest, that don't own their own parcel data. Here in the St
Louis area many of the counties have actually leased their parcel data from
a private company for decades. The yearly lease includes an
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Brian Cavagnolo bcavagn...@gmail.com wrote:
Regarding the data gathering, the main objective is to gather recent
raw data, licensing terms, and meta data from jurisdictions in
whatever form they make it available, organize it in a dumb directory
structure. I
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
I always find it boggling that open data projects are willing to use
google docs and google hangouts. It would be really nice to at least
have the data in a free software/free culture compatible place like an
OSM foundation
On 2/22/13 1:19 PM, Charlotte Wolter wrote:
As for using ref, that changes the nature of that tag. Now
we use ref to give the same identification to multiple pieces of a
way, not to give different identities to pieces of a way. I think it
might be better to include the number of each
Other than Google Mapmaker is there any other ways that Google's data
gets updated? ... Does Google import any data from OSM?
I know they import data from Wikipedia. See page 2 of
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Eq73uboh5gOiIRf0xmOCCNS9GqQT9o38jA2e1Isog88/edit?usp=sharing
After seeing
Nothing in that presentation says that Google sourced the data from
Wikipedia, just that Wikipedia and Google had the same coordinates, which in
this case would be from some official source. The current data on Google
also differs from Wikipedia.
From: Michael Patrick
Nothing in that presentation says that Google sourced the data from
Wikipedia, just that Wikipedia and Google had the same coordinates, which
in this case would be from some “official” source.
That's why I backtracked exhaustively from every official source -
Washington State Pilot's Manual,
Done. Including all Los Padres National Forest wilderness boundaries
(of which there are ten).
I've also sent the suggester my ten steps for using the data source
he pointed me to. We've never met, but now OSM community is that
much stronger.
Now I'm finding additional correct wiki pages
17 matches
Mail list logo
