After hands down. That's how I do intersections like that with one minor
difference. If the road on the right (as in the example) doesn't have a
divider, I merge the ways before leaving the intersection so I would have 3
traffic light nodes instead of 4.
-James
On 2013-10-14 10:42 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
So what are we talking about? Intersections like this one, where one
or more dual carriageways come together at an at-grade intersection:
https://www.evernote.com/shard/s9/sh/6438c196-bb92-4f66-81dc-9b75186286ba/0e8f07ff527c6a85c0dec426b9b79f1e
2013/10/15 Minh Nguyen m...@nguyen.cincinnati.oh.us
** Example A **
Ryans Way and Sycamore Grove Ln. meet Fields Ertel Rd. at the same
intersection. Fields Ertel is undivided. Ryans Way is briefly divided at
the subdivision entrance, a very common configuration in newer
subdivisions, but
James Mast wrote:
After hands down. That's how I do intersections like that with one minor
difference. If the road on the right (as in the example) doesn't have a
divider, I merge the ways before leaving the intersection so I would have
3 traffic light nodes instead of 4.
-James
That's
Hi Minh -
Thanks for clarifying the more specific cases. I realize that my
example would not cover all the possible permutations. Thank you for
bringing more specific cases to the table. My colleague Kristen also
has some more specific examples I know she intends to share here. Your
specific
On 2013-10-15 4:12 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
I apologize for the confusion around the term 'braiding' - we used
this term internally for a while (and it ended up in some changeset
comments) not realizing that this had a different meaning that traces
back to the TIGER source data.
To me, the
The election for 2013-2014 is complete and the new board consists of:
Mele Sax-Barnett
Kathleen Danielson
Ian Dees
Martijn van Exel
Alex Barth
The formal roles (President, VP, etc.) will be determined by the new
board during their first meeting, and will be announced shortly after
that meeting.
I just want to emphasize that there are (at least) two separate but
related issues here:
1) Whether the before or after style is preferred or more correct,
2) What a routing algorithm (potentially yet-to-be-coded or
now-actually coded) does with either or both.
Regarding 1), it appears
Congrats to the new board!
Steve
On Oct 15, 2013, at 12:01 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
The election for 2013-2014 is complete and the new board consists of:
Mele Sax-Barnett
Kathleen Danielson
Ian Dees
Martijn van Exel
Alex Barth
The formal roles (President, VP,
Awesome. Congratulations to all. AFAIC, everyone is a winner in this
election. Thanks to our election observers for helping out.
SEJ
-- SEJ
-- twitter: @geomantic
-- skype: sejohnson8
There are two types of people in the world. Those that can extrapolate from
incomplete data.
On Tue, Oct 15,
agreed! congrats to a wonderful board and all who participated. it promises to
be a great year!
On Oct 15, 2013, at 2:22 PM, Steven Johnson sejohns...@gmail.com wrote:
Awesome. Congratulations to all. AFAIC, everyone is a winner in this
election. Thanks to our election observers for
People will map as they see fit and, as pointed out elsewhere in this thread,
it is not possible to correct all instances of all variations.
That said, the wiki is replete with guidance on preferred tagging for various
features so it is not out of line to work toward a preferred method of
Just to check, in the case of number 3, if a traffic signal was present
at the above direction, would there have to be two traffic signal for
the up-and-down two-way road?
Saikrishna Arcot
On Tue 15 Oct 2013 03:14:13 PM EDT, Tod Fitch wrote:
People will map as they see fit and, as pointed out
It would be tagged as described at
http://wiki.openstreetmaps.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#Tag_all_incoming_ways
Tod
--
Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse my brevity.
Saikrishna Arcot saiarcot...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to check, in the case of number 3, if a traffic signal was
ref: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/California#Highway_types and
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging
Specific questions:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/37.38554/-122.05217
Should Central Expressway be marked as primary rather than trunk at this point?
The
On 10/15/13 7:29 PM, Tod Fitch wrote:
ref: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/California#Highway_types and
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging
Specific questions:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/37.38554/-122.05217
Should Central Expressway be marked as
On Tuesday 2013-10-15 16:29 -0700, Tod Fitch wrote:
ref: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/California#Highway_types and
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging
Specific questions:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/37.38554/-122.05217
Should Central Expressway be
On 10/15/13 8:01 PM, Chris Lawrence wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Las_Vegas
Defining an alt_name or loc_name of Las Vegas on each of the
surrounding CDP boundaries/relations may help Nominatim geocode these
cases better. But the CDPs are not part of the city (aside from any
areas
18 matches
Mail list logo
