According to http://www.ncgicc.com/Default.aspx?tabid=135 and links
therein, they are doing 1/4 of the state per year on a rolling basis.
This year they photographed the eastern Piedmont and are currently
getting it ready for release, probably in early 2014. In 2014 they are
photographing
Hi James,
I had not thought of the Case of the Hidden Segments. It makes sense
to tag them, but would it not be more in line with general OSM tagging
practice to use role:signed = yes/no?
I think it's a valuable extension on the role discussion, perhaps you
can add a paragraph to the wiki page
I think the unsigned_ref practice is so common here that we should
just keep that practice. Perhaps also a good one to document on the
wiki. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Directions_In_The_United_States
may not be the best place for it unless we want to make this page
cover the
On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 11:57 AM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
Peter, it would just be for the relations. It would stay the current
status-quo for the ways using at all times the ref unsigned_ref tags
(see I-394 example below).
In your example with I-394 and US-12, if you
Richard - true. It's sort of a chicken vs egg situation. As long as
there is no clear use case for one or the other, both practices will
remain in use. That's why I was so excited to see work continue on the
shield rendering which uses the refs on the relations. As I mentioned,
at Telenav we also
I just created a stub for the signed / unsigned paragraph on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Directions_In_The_United_States
- however, the {{Tag}} template does not support the inclusion of a |
as far as I can see.. Please feel free to expand / edit.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:25 AM,
On 12/5/13 12:17 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
For what it's worth, at Telenav we have started relying solely on the
relation refs when it comes to route numbers. The way refs just seem
so cumbersome to maintain, and make for a lot of redundant
information. This is the stuff that relations were
2013/12/5 Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org
I think the unsigned_ref practice is so common here that we should
just keep that practice. Perhaps also a good one to document on the
wiki.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Highway_Directions_In_The_United_States
may not be the best place for it
Dear All,
Make your plans to attend SotM-EU, in Karlsruhe, Germany, in June 2014.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org
Date: Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:33 AM
Subject: [OSM-talk] SotM-EU 2014 in Karlsruhe, Germany
To: Talk Openstreetmap
Martijn,
How would you suggest using the role:signed = yes/no (or is this just for
completely unsigned highways like I-124 in TN where we can add this info into
the main tags of the relation)? We would still need a way to keep the
direction for the unsigned segment of the route in the role so
Hi All:
I have a question: Why can't there be member tag values? There are tag values
for ways, so why not members? Just a thought.
Best,
Kristen
---
OSM Profile -- http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/KristenK
From: James Mast [mailto:rickmastfa...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 05,
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 07:07:29 -0500
From: Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Marion and Lane County, Oregon county roads
Message-ID: 529c7801.2080...@averillpark.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
On 12/2/13 3:50 AM,
Forgot to include talk-us in my response to James.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org
Date: Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:01 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Separate relations for each direction of US
State highways.
To: James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
On
Ways are objects in their own right, so they can have tags, but
members only exist as a reference on a relation, so there is not
really a model for tags on members.
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Kam, Kristen -(p) krist...@telenav.com wrote:
Hi All:
I have a question: Why can’t there be
Another update on this: following James's earlier suggestion that we
needed editor support for the n/s/e/w roles with way direction
reversal and (in the case of JOSM) the relation editor, I got some dev
time at Telenav to get the necessary JOSM patches done. I already
submitted the iD patch myself
15 matches
Mail list logo
