* Elliott Plack [2014-03-28 02:53 -0400]:
> Interesting note about this in Maryland. My friend Mike showed me that some
> mappers have been using the *county* route numbers on some county roads in
> Maryland.
Since Maryland counties don't sign their route numbers[0], they're using
unsigned_ref=,
Phil,
That's right. I would use unsigned_ref for county routes. In Baltimore
County the county route numbers are never signed and not really even
advertised. You'd have to look at SHA databases to figure out the ref. Here
is an example using the proposed tagging (without using relations).
http://
"* the ref= on relations only contains the number. Any data consumer
composes the full route shield / name from the network and the ref
tags."
Almost. :-) ref= contains the specific identifier of the route.
where I-35 splits into I-35E and I-35W (in two different states!) the
ref= should be 35E o
On 3/28/14 11:33 AM, Elliott Plack wrote:
> Phil,
>
> That's right. I would use unsigned_ref for county routes. In Baltimore
> County the county route numbers are never signed and not really even
> advertised. You'd have to look at SHA databases to figure out the ref. Here
> is an example using the
Hi all, been following the thread, just hadn't yet taken the time to write.
Part of the confusion is the lack of a 'definitive' wiki page. Here
are some links, partly contradicting each other:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/United_States_roads_tagging
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Unit
On 23:53 2014-03-27, Elliott Plack wrote:
Interesting note about this in Maryland. My friend Mike showed me that
some mappers have been using the *county* route numbers on some county
roads in Maryland. All county roads in MD have a 4 digit number that
starts with CO, like CO1150. CO is also the
6 matches
Mail list logo
