On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 08:04 +0200, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I'm comfortable executing this but I love exact specifications:
Undelete everything deleted by user U since time T unless the object
was also created by U would work.
That works for me, but I really would like to see a clarification from
The mapper in question is still active, with reasonable edits.
So it looks like a mistake, or a newbie mistake.
Revert anyway.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
That is what I thought as well. It is now gone. If I didn't screw up the
boundary multipolygons everything should be correct. (I hate boundaries!!!)
Thanks for the help,
Clifford
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Steven Johnson sejohns...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yes, U.S. Census Bureau treats them as
Hi,
On 05/20/2015 05:47 AM, Jason Straub wrote:
Was working through some railroad edits, and stumbled upon an odd edit
in the city of Graham, TX. Investigating further, I traced it back to
this changeset: https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24254640, in
which the editor added addr:city
I would like to remove Machias, Washington admin_level 8 since it does not
exist as a city in Washington. It has been there for a number of years
apparently added by a bot. I plan to leave it as a CDP locality node. There
doesn't seem to be any chance that it will become a city and will most
On 5/19/15 8:35 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
I would like to remove Machias, Washington admin_level 8 since it
does not exist as a city in Washington. It has been there for a number
of years apparently added by a bot. I plan to leave it as a CDP
locality node. There doesn't seem to be any chance
Morning all,
Was working through some railroad edits, and stumbled upon an odd edit in the
city of Graham, TX. Investigating further, I traced it back to this changeset:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/24254640, in which the editor added
addr:city and addr:postcode to every single
The nodes w/ place names are good to have to support a healthy gazetteer
function. Much harder to make a case for keeping CDP boundaries.
--SEJ
Sent from my electronic tether.
On 2015年5月19日, at 20:47, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 5/19/15 8:35 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
I
Yes, U.S. Census Bureau treats them as statistical, not aim boundaries.
--SEJ
Sent from my electronic tether.
On 2015年5月19日, at 21:33, stevea stevea...@softworkers.com wrote:
On 5/19/15 Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
they probably shouldn't be in an administrative boundary
Hey y'all,
I am giving a lightning talk http://stateofthemap.us/lightning-talks-sun/
at SOTMUS on how to organize a mapathon and would like your input! The way
that I can give the best advice is to hear from people who have organized
and attended mapathons in lots of different places. It will
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:11 AM Shawn K. Quinn skqu...@rushpost.com wrote:
If we were able to look at his
changeset comments and see withdraw additions tainted by Google data
or similar, we probably wouldn't be having this discussion right now.
I disagree. In this group of changesets, he has
On 5/18/2015 7:13 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
At first glance it really looks as if the user did nothing more than
random deletions across the country. I wonder why it hasn't been noticed
before.
In the US, it's probably related to the number of regular mappers per
unit area. If no mappers
On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 17:24 +, Clay Smalley wrote:
I disagree. In this group of changesets, he has deleted things that
were not added by himself. He deleted my own original work that I
surveyed and traced. And I'm baffled as to why.
We would have at least had some idea what was going
Yeah, I think Cam4rd98 was just deleting stuff for kicks possibly
I just was checking he deletions, and noticed he completely deleted a brand new
expressway [1] that I traced out and added in Fayetteville, NC [2]. Sure, some
of the ways originally used the same IDs of ways he created, but,
14 matches
Mail list logo
