Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 10:55 PM, wrote: > > > I was thinking of using MODOT Functional classification maps to set roads > to. Basically the following: > > > > MODOT : OSM > > > > Interstate : motorway > > Freeway and Expressway : trunk > > Other Principal Arterial : primary >

Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

> I was thinking of using MODOT Functional classification maps to set roads to. > Basically the following: > > MODOT : OSM > > Interstate : motorway > Freeway and Expressway : trunk > Other Principal Arterial : primary > Minor Arterial : secondary > Major Collector : tertiary > Minor

Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

On 3/5/17 8:22 AM, Mike N wrote: > Hi, > >Typically, regional classifications do not map into OSM > classification, and often conflict. > > If a freeway / expressway is constructed as an OSM motorway, it > should be motorway. > > If a 'local' road serves an industrial area it should be >

Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Mike N wrote: > Hi, > >Typically, regional classifications do not map into OSM classification, > and often conflict. > > If a freeway / expressway is constructed as an OSM motorway, it should > be motorway. > The american concept of

Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

Hi, Typically, regional classifications do not map into OSM classification, and often conflict. If a freeway / expressway is constructed as an OSM motorway, it should be motorway. If a 'local' road serves an industrial area it should be unclassified because it doesn't serve

Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 9:55 PM, wrote: > > > I was thinking of using MODOT Functional classification maps to set roads > to. Basically the following: > > > > MODOT : OSM > > > > Interstate : motorway > > Freeway and Expressway : trunk > > Other Principal Arterial : primary > >