David, I would contact Nathan Mixter directly (in OSM, nmixter, import account
Eureka gold) and ask him what he thinks, as he is (largely speaking) the
original importer of these (and many other, very large) imports, many of which,
unfortunately generated consternation or reversion. You might
You’re referring to the Scrub From Hell.
I (user SJFriedl) have been mapping extensively in Orange County and
(especially) in the Santa Ana Mountains and this thing is *everywhere*. Not
patches here and there, but everything everywhere is part of one enormous scrub
relation and it’s positively
On 2017.08.13. 23:11, David Kewley wrote:
> Development in Orange County, California pushes into areas currently
> covered by polygons (often large multipolygons) tagged as natural=scrub,
> landuse=meadow, or landuse=[farm|farmland]. These were part of the FMMP
> import
Development in Orange County, California pushes into areas currently
covered by polygons (often large multipolygons) tagged as natural=scrub,
landuse=meadow, or landuse=[farm|farmland]. These were part of the FMMP
import http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/California_Farms.
Mostly I try to leave
On 12/08/2017 00:45, Rihards wrote:
seems to be streetcomplete, although i thought it edited osm data
I did try and discuss this sort of problem with the author over at
https://github.com/westnordost/StreetComplete/issues/351 - specifically
to say that someone running StreetComplete should
These are based off of Lambertus's work here:
http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl
If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel
free to ask. However, please do not send me private mail. The
odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by
asking on the talk-us@
6 matches
Mail list logo
