Cycleway crossing
At the risk of opening this discussion too far, here is the way I handle
exactly this situation.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit?editor=id#map=21/45.14100/-93.38143
Ignore any slight mis-alignment between aerial photos and the location of
the nodes and ways. I used Mapbox
It seems to me that having a relationship is absolutely appropriate and
that it should have the name of entire trail/route, just as you have done.
It also seems to me that having a name on individual segments (the local
name) is also appropriate. I don't think this is inconsistent and in fact,
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2020 17:19:57 -0700
> From: stevea
> To: Tod Fitch
> Cc: talk-us , Bob Gambrel
>
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Streaming JOSM -- suggestions?
> Message-ID:
> Con
A very good answer stevea. I suspect the changes I have been making would
be appropriate enough for removing tiger_reviewed=no.
1) almost always have driven the road as passenger taking notes in OSMAND+
about pavement type
2) in ID carefully aligning the roads
3) in ID verifying that an extra
Streaming JOSM -- TIGER
I would like very much to know some guidelines about what to do with TIGER
data. I run across it all the time and think maybe I should leave some
indication that the data has been verified or changed or something. I just
don't know what I should do so leave the TIGER data
Paul's in depth answer of my question was very helpful. Luckily I am not
concentrating on road/highway routes. I like the concept of:
We should be moving forward towards
all routes being tagged in a route relation so we can phase out route
attributes on ways, freeing those up for *the way's
Paul Johnson says
Ultimately consider adding a route relation with network=US:NSFR:Forest
Name:FH/FR as well so we can finally kill off route tagging on things that
are not routes.
I am not doing any mapping for forest roads, but the above caught my eye. I
am doing a lot of bike path/trail
ld likely be passable
>>> with permission and the right vehicle.
>>>
>>> As for sections that cross [frozen] marshes, or other areas that aren't
>>> passable when the ground is thawed, I don't know. Maybe there is a use case
>>> for "highway=frozen&
Am newby to talk-us. This may have been discussed in the past but not handy
with searching archives yet.
In Minnesota I have seen snowmobile trails mapped in OSM as follows:
highway=track
snowmobile=designated
surface=unpaved
In both aerial photos and observation on the ground, there is almost
9 matches
Mail list logo