I'm still getting a handle on the schemas in use for OSM, and noticed that
concept of matching address nodes to ways when doing imports.
I'm not so sure this will be very functional for floodplain counties or heavy
agricultural counties. We have thousands of addresses with no corresponding
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Lord-Castillo, Brett
blord-casti...@stlouisco.com wrote:
I'm still getting a handle on the schemas in use for OSM, and noticed that
concept of matching address nodes to ways when doing imports.
I'm not so sure this will be very functional for floodplain
On 16 Nov 2009, at 7:40 , Anthony wrote:
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Lord-Castillo, Brett
blord-casti...@stlouisco.com wrote:
I'm still getting a handle on the schemas in use for OSM, and noticed that
concept of matching address nodes to ways when doing imports.
I'm not so sure this
On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 12:07 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
On Nov 15, 2009, at 8:23 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 10:05 PM, SteveC st...@asklater.com wrote:
So you put the house numbers on the nodes and then what happens with them
all when you switch the way
direction?
Dan,
What's wrong with doing automated addressing imports in situations where we
have point level address data? Or are you just referring to not importing
the addressing that is available for the Tiger data?
Kate Chapman
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
On
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 18:28 -0500, Kate Chapman wrote:
Maybe I'm confused about the address versus road information. I would
think the address point would be the front door of the building and
would not be a relation to the road. So the node of the address and
the way of the road would not
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 18:54 -0500, Anthony wrote:
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
On Sun, 2009-11-15 at 18:11 -0500, Kate Chapman wrote:
What's wrong with doing automated addressing imports in situations
where we have point level address data?
The issue
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:04 PM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
There's nothing wrong with doing point-level address imports. The only
thing I would suggest is ensuring that we connect those points ways or
whatever to the roads that represent them somehow.
1) Why?
2) Are you planning on
For a single county or jurisdiction, if you delete the TIGER data and
import more accurate local data, what do you do at the boundaries?
County/Stare data sets I've seen usually get cut off +/- a few hundred
feet (if that) from the boundary. Does somebody go through and make
them
Oops hit reply instead of replying to the mailing list :/
I personally favor having the possible address range in the street way
segment (between intersections) Easier to edit and maintain, as well as
smaller memory and bandwidth when working with it. Split each intersection,
then build
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Peter Batty peter.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm coming a bit late to this debate, but I just wanted to raise a fairly
basic question, which is whether the Karlsruhe schema is the best one to use
in the situation we find ourselves in with TIGER, where quite a bit of
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Split each intersection, then build relations for the streets.
Do you even have to split? Just add a node, and put the house number
on the node.
One of the problems has been which side is left if the way is reversed.
Put
If you have two streets intersecting and put a number on that node, it isn't
clear which street that applies to. You could add an artificial node close
to the end of the street, but that seems a bit more messy to me. So my gut
feel is that the simplest approach is still attributes on the street.
When I said messy, I guess I was thinking of two things - one is doing the
import, as you mention here (which is sort of where the discussion started).
This seems quite a bit more complex if you have to split ways and insert
nodes.
The other is in writing a geocoding engine based on the data
Anthony writes:
On Sun, Nov 15, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Peter Batty peter.ba...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm coming a bit late to this debate, but I just wanted to raise
a fairly basic question, which is whether the Karlsruhe schema is
the best one to use in the situation we find ourselves in with
Russ, I think you misunderstood my comment. I am in the TIGER import is a
good thing camp. But in the areas I have worked in it has needed a fair bit
of minor positional cleanup. My point is that in those cases where you need
to graphically adjust a street, I don't want to have to edit three or
16 matches
Mail list logo
