Re: [Talk-us] Route Relations and Special (Bannered) Routes

This was discussed in the August 2011 thread, Use of ref-tag on state highways. At the time, a number of people seemed to be on board with the network-classification-per-banner scheme, as in: network=US:US:Alternate ref=1 Or, something similar at the state level: network=US:VA:Secondary

[Talk-us] Route Relations and Special (Bannered) Routes

I'd like to solicit some thoughts on the tagging for special routes (commonly known as bannered routes)[0]. In route relations, it's customary to separate the network and the reference number. How do or should special routes fit into that? I'm torn between three views and I'm not sure which of

Re: [Talk-us] Route Relations and Special (Bannered) Routes

On 3/11/12 11:16 AM, Phil! Gold wrote: I'm partial to the idea of separating the banner from the reference number, but I'm not sure how any of these ideas mesh with the understandings of people with more experience with road networks than I have. i like the idea of separating banners out too,

Re: [Talk-us] Route Relations and Special (Bannered) Routes

* Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net [2012-03-11 20:59 -0400]: On 3/11/12 11:16 AM, Phil! Gold wrote: I'm partial to the idea of separating the banner from the reference number, but I'm not sure how any of these ideas mesh with the understandings of people with more experience with road