Re: [Talk-us] TIGER road expansion code

2012-05-12 Thread Anthony
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote: W and W Industrial Rd expands to West and W Industrial Road, since W is the direction_prefix, but the second W is unaccounted for, the script doesn't know if that is supposed to be W or West (and neither do I). The old

Re: [Talk-us] TIGER road expansion code

2012-05-12 Thread Serge Wroclawski
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Dale Puch dale.p...@gmail.com wrote: Nice work.  See the list of way names I posted in the other thread for some odd name or tag test cases. Dale, What I need at this point are people to look at the code, and give concrete feedback directly on the functionality

Re: [Talk-us] TIGER road expansion code

2012-05-12 Thread Anthony
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: What percentage of roads, where the old script would have punted, are now being expanded correctly? The new script is up now. I used Maryland as a test

Re: [Talk-us] TIGER road expansion code

2012-05-12 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On 5/12/2012 12:41 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote: What error rate is acceptable? As low as possible, but I've been generally able to handle the edge cases I've seen, either by doing the right thing, or by punting and doing nothing at all. It's worth noting that any errors are already there as

Re: [Talk-us] TIGER road expansion code

2012-05-12 Thread Anthony
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote: It's worth noting that any errors are already there as errors in the TIGER tags. So, had the TIGER import been done properly in the first place, these errors would be in the name tags as well. This seems to be the

Re: [Talk-us] TIGER road expansion code

2012-05-12 Thread Mike N
On 5/12/2012 5:54 PM, Anthony wrote: If so, this is good, but it does mean that road names are going to get out of sync, if, for instance, tiger:name_base was removed from some of the ways and not removed from others. This will complicate later fixes/enhancements. This also happens long

Re: [Talk-us] TIGER road expansion code

2012-05-12 Thread Anthony
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 6:01 PM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote: On 5/12/2012 5:54 PM, Anthony wrote: If so, this is good, but it does mean that road names are going to get out of sync, if, for instance, tiger:name_base was removed from some of the ways and not removed from others.  This will

[Talk-us] TIGER road expansion code

2012-05-11 Thread Serge Wroclawski
Since the other thread has gotten a bit long, I want to start a new thread to discuss the TIGER road expansion code. The current version of the code is at: https://gist.github.com/2656735 Taking Dale's test cases, I've met a new version of the code and ran it against Maryland. (I didn't put the