http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dridge
seems to suggest that the appropriate way to tag a ridge is as a way. Any
thoughts on this? I'm looking at 100+ ridges, wondering how to simplify
(de-node) yet keep the way roughly following to contours of the feature it's
supposed to be
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 1:09 PM, Thomas Colson thomas_col...@nps.gov wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dridge
seems to suggest that the appropriate way to tag a ridge is as a way. Any
thoughts on this? I’m looking at 100+ ridges, wondering how to simplify
(de-node) yet
I have tagged numerous ridges (dozens, at least), always as a way.
To me, it doesn't make sense for a ridge to be a single node, that
semantic might be better conveyed with natural=peak. I include a
medium-sized mountain range, the Santa Cruz Mountains
(www.osm.org/browse/way/174808173),
3 matches
Mail list logo