Richard Weait rich...@weait.com writes:
So currently, I think removing the reviewed:no means, I've improved
this rather than, I've perfected this. To encourage or support more
demanding requirements should surely be backed with a tool that reminds
and suggests how to fix TIGER.
I would
Bottom line, to me this means the segment is at LEAST reasonably
usable for maps. Proper placement and name tag, with junctions,
bridges, and split carriageways for stuff like interstates.
The definition details probably don't matter other than for reference
on the wiki, as it is going to be
On Apr 25, 2009, at 7:47 AM, Bill Ricker wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 9:53 AM, Russ Nelson r...@cloudmade.com
wrote:
Okay, it's pretty clear that most people don't want this change
implemented.
but it's still the right thing to do.
Yes and no. Further to Apo's point that
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 19:09 -0700, Russ Nelson wrote:
I think we need to morph this over to a discussion of what, exactly,
does the absence of tiger:reviewed=no mean? Does it mean one or all of:
o I have travelled the entire length of the way. It is spatially
correct.
o I have
4 matches
Mail list logo
