On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 5:23 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Having said that - this is what he had in mind when we invented addr:*,
but of course if the wider community wants to use addr:* for different
stuff then I guess we cannot keep them from it...
It looks like the
At 2010-12-31 14:22, Toby Murray wrote:
... Also, is there much value in
adding these tags on multi-state relations? For example:
addr:state=TN;KY;OH;IN on this relation:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/444136
[ US-27 ]
Not IMO for US-* routes. No more than tagging everything
Hi,
Many route relations use addr:state to describe what state the route
is in. Should a tag intended for addresses be used this way, or is
is_in:state a better tag to use?
The addr:* family of tags was created exclusively with addressing in
mind. Only objects that have a postal address
3 matches
Mail list logo
