Re: [Talk-us] Gosh ... something about mapping ...

I've also been researching this with some local traffic engineers / road fans. There are still instances of this sign being posted, mostly on dirt roads where the DOT does not want tracked vehicles like bulldozers--or tanks--to drive them. That said, I don't see an applicable access restriction

Re: [Talk-us] Gosh ... something about mapping ...

Reading from http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-04-28/html/2011-10258.htm > The FHWA's current definition of a motorcycle is two-fold: (1) Motorcycles, and (2) motor bicycles and scooters. The specific language for defining motorcycles, provided in FHWA's Guide, follows: >Item I.E.2.

Re: [Talk-us] Gosh ... something about mapping ...

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Harald Kliems wrote: > Very useful, Simon. Thanks! > > Slightly OT: Can anybody explain what R5-5, "No vehicles with lugs" means? > I'm assuming it doesn't refer to vehicles like this >

Re: [Talk-us] Gosh ... something about mapping ...

On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Simon Poole wrote: > > I've changed the relevant tags to moped=no. Any opinion on if mopeds would > be included in "motor vehicles"? I don't think I've ever seen a mofa in the > states (I find people on Vespas in the states already fairly brave)

[Talk-us] iD 1.8.1 release candidate with IE11 & Edge support

Hey everyone, Just wanted to send a quick note that I’ve prepared a new version of iD that supports Internet Explorer 11 and Edge browsers (finally!). I have only tested these browsers through vmware, so I would really like to get some more mappers to try them out and let me know if there are

Re: [Talk-us] Gosh ... something about mapping ...

Well ... the definitions are very fuzzy (this is just so that you are aware that there is potential for conflict): mopeds* are in general just low displacement motorcycles, historically with pedals , but that is typically no longer a legal requirement. For example there are scooters that fall in