Hi all,
I¹m forwarding on this request to the list:
I helped a bit with the numbers, but I don't know who started the metrics?
If you have the inclination to edit the Budget page, please do!
Thanks,
Hurricane
Hurricane (or Steve, or else please forward :),
Can you elaborate a bit on the
On 10/18/2010 03:31 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Alex Mauerha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 10/15/2010 09:44 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
i've seen an argument that the correct network value for a county
route involves using the actual county name, e.g.
I wouldn’t
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
For relations I agree, but for ways this doesn’t work. And as renderers can
only handle ways for now…
I guess renderers are going to be wrong or now.
For now shouldn't last too long, though. Just remove the ref info
from
On 10/18/2010 04:16 PM, Anthony wrote:
I guess renderers are going to be wrong or now.
For now shouldn't last too long, though. Just remove the ref info
from the ways, and the renderers will likely get their act together
rather quickly.
I for one would consider that to be vandalism. I also
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 10/18/2010 04:16 PM, Anthony wrote:
I guess renderers are going to be wrong or now.
For now shouldn't last too long, though. Just remove the ref info
from the ways, and the renderers will likely get their act
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 10/18/2010 04:16 PM, Anthony wrote:
I guess renderers are going to be wrong or now.
For now shouldn't last too long, though. Just remove the ref info
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 10/18/2010 04:16 PM, Anthony wrote:
I guess renderers are going to be wrong or now.
For now shouldn't last too long, though. Just remove the ref info
On 10/18/2010 04:41 PM, Anthony wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Anthonyo...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Alex Mauerha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 10/18/2010 04:16 PM, Anthony wrote:
I guess renderers are going to be wrong or now.
For now shouldn't last too
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 10/18/2010 04:16 PM, Anthony wrote:
I guess renderers are going to be wrong or
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:37 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 10/18/2010 04:16
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
On 10/15/2010 05:08 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Ian Dees
ian.dees-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumw...@public.gmane.org
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Ways and relations are equally easy to break
Nope. They're not, because relation membership is not a tag on the
way. A way is always uploaded with its tags, but for various reasons
(editor bugs, huge relations causing timeouts,
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Ways and relations are equally easy to break
Nope. They're not, because
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Zeke Farwell ezeki...@gmail.com wrote:
On the other hand no renderer or other data user I've heard of is
being negatively affected by the presence of bicycle=avoid so perhaps it
doesn't matter.
I don't know if he's had any success, but Paul has attempted to get
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 7:43 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
wrote:
Come one, Come all!
The U.S. Chapter of OSM is launching its own Marketing and
Communication Working Group to support the chapter's activities with
marketing and publicity.
But, to do this right, we need YOU!
If you have experience or an interest in public relations,
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:33 PM, Zeke Farwell ezeki...@gmail.com wrote:
On the other hand no renderer or other data user I've heard of is
being negatively affected by the presence of bicycle=avoid so perhaps it
doesn't matter.
It seems dangerous to use an access tag for something other than
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
What if the law is implicit? Is there consensus whether or not to tag
implicit laws?
Yes, we tag implicit speed limits (along with a source:maxspeed or whatever).
But there is a dispute between Nathan and Paul as to whether or
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
What if the law is implicit? Is there consensus whether or not to tag
implicit laws?
Yes, we tag implicit speed limits (along with a source:maxspeed or
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:52 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:29 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
What if the law is implicit? Is there consensus whether or not to tag
implicit laws?
Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
On 10/15/2010 09:44 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
I don't think we should be storing any prefix as part of the
network=*
or ref=* tags (thus my
22 matches
Mail list logo
