On 7/10/2012 5:43 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Oh, and South Carolina. Not going to touch that.
Don't Tread on Us - LOL.
The state capital region of Columbia, South Carolina will be a prime
test of the Do empty areas attract contributors? theory for some time
to come.
Hi,
On 07/11/12 13:59, Mike N wrote:
The state capital region of Columbia, South Carolina will be a prime
test of the Do empty areas attract contributors? theory for some time
to come.
Why, is someone planning to remove the TIGER import in that area?
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ##
On 7/11/2012 8:38 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 07/11/12 13:59, Mike N wrote:
The state capital region of Columbia, South Carolina will be a prime
test of the Do empty areas attract contributors? theory for some time
to come.
Why, is someone planning to remove the TIGER import in that
On 7/11/2012 8:38 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 07/11/12 13:59, Mike N wrote:
The state capital region of Columbia, South Carolina will be a prime
test of the Do empty areas attract contributors? theory for some time
to come.
Why, is someone planning to remove the TIGER import in that
Hi,
On 07/11/12 15:20, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
The state capital region of Columbia, South Carolina will be a prime
test of the Do empty areas attract contributors? theory for some time
to come.
Why, is someone planning to remove the TIGER import in that area?
Yes, wherever those TIGER
On 7/11/2012 9:31 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 07/11/12 15:20, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
The state capital region of Columbia, South Carolina will be a prime
test of the Do empty areas attract contributors? theory for some time
to come.
Why, is someone planning to remove the TIGER import
On 07/11/2012 09:31 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Obviously my comment was a bit tongue-in-cheek; I am personally
convinced that the unedited TIGER landscape - i.e. a map of which
virtually nothing is correct and once you start to work somewhere you
have to touch almost every single object if you
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Kevin Kenny kken...@nycap.rr.com wrote:
I'd be fine with trying to clean up unedited TIGER - or even a
horrible mess of half-deleted TIGER - if the expectations of
the results weren't quite so daunting.
[ ... ]
Larger cleanups can be imposing at first glance.
Kevin,
On 07/11/12 16:20, Kevin Kenny wrote:
The data checks in JOSM and Potlatch2 are fine in that they all
indeed highlight potential problems.
As RichardF has pointed out, Potlatch2 sorely lacks any kind of data
check. With the exception of unconnected road ends flashing aggressively.
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Kevin Kenny kken...@nycap.rr.com wrote:
The culture of
OSM seems to be veering from bad data happens, and when it does,
other mappers fix it, to we have to protect the map from the
mappers.
Not from mappers, from disruptive bots.
Hi,
On 11.07.2012 17:44, Frederik Ramm wrote:
As RichardF has pointed out, Potlatch2 sorely lacks any kind of data
check. With the exception of unconnected road ends flashing aggressively.
I have been informed that I have no clue, and P2 never did that.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ##
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I have been informed that I have no clue
Actually the phrase I used was that Frederik clearly knows as much about
Potlatch as I do about JOSM. (But I suspect more.)
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
The newer TIGER 2011 data is a BIG improvement over the original TIGER data
that was put in the US. When the roads for Columbia, SC are deleted by the
license bot, someone could go in and upload the TIGER 2011 data for
Columbia. Of course, things like footways and parks may be deleted as well,
If people don't want to do the TIGER fixup all over again, they could import
the TIGER 2011 data which is of MUCH better quality than the TIGER data that
was originally imported into OSM (though not quite perfect). In fact, I
sometimes use the TIGER data overlay to get the names of roads that
14 matches
Mail list logo
