These are based off of Lambertus's work here:
http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl
If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel
free to ask. However, please do not send me private mail. The
odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by
asking on the talk-us@
The inherent problem with ferry routes is that they have a schedule.
Routers can't then tell their users how long it is going to take without
that data.
As far as I know we don't have schedule capability within OSM and it is
something that the routers have not pulled not even the big G. The big G
Graphhopper doesn't have the problem. It could be that other routers are
using outdated data that did indeed have a tagging problem.
https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=47.811656%2C-122.379627point=47.809696%2C-122.528286layer=Lyrk
Harald.
On Thu Jan 01 2015 at 10:20:45 AM Clifford Snow
On 1/1/15 1:55 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Natfoot natf...@gmail.com
mailto:natf...@gmail.com wrote:
The inherent problem with ferry routes is that they have a
schedule. Routers can't then tell their users how long it is
going to take without that
On 1/1/15 12:13 PM, Harald Kliems wrote:
Graphhopper doesn't have the problem. It could be that other routers
are using outdated data that did indeed have a tagging problem.
https://graphhopper.com/maps/?point=47.811656%2C-122.379627point=47.809696%2C-122.528286layer=Lyrk
in the long run, we
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Natfoot natf...@gmail.com wrote:
The inherent problem with ferry routes is that they have a schedule.
Routers can't then tell their users how long it is going to take without
that data.
As far as I know we don't have schedule capability within OSM and it is
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 11:18 PM, Natfoot natf...@gmail.com wrote:
When talking to the Scout team this summer it was mentioned as an issue.
Also Scout wont route across access roads and if there is an access road
leading up to the dock/portal then no route. you will notice that it is
listed
GTFS works fine for ferries already. Many do publish the data.
d.
On Jan 1, 2015, at 10:55, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote:
I agree. However, it would be nice to have it show the route. Somehow we can
route via bus using GTFS. I wonder if ferry routes have a similar spec?
i suppose OSM could use access=permissive for
the preferred route, but that usage doesn't match
well with the current language for permissive.
Richard, I'm not sure this is a perfect solution, but it could work.
What about using access=destination (Only when travelling to this
element...) on
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Darrell Fuhriman darr...@garnix.org
wrote:
GTFS works fine for ferries already. Many do publish the data.
I just checked, Washington State Ferries does use GTFS [1]. I originally
posted this message because of a Scout note in OSM. My sense is the problem
is
What I'm not quite sure about are federal records such as FRA records (as
I believe Oak Ridge data are). These would be covered under, say, a FOIA
request, and so are quite similar to the same nexus argument as state
records, only under federal law, not state law.
Generally, I have had very
I don't think that this is a tagging but a routing problem. It seems easy
enough to me to program a router do not use roads with access=private
unless they are the first or last segment of a route or something along
those lines.
RE: access=destination. Not sure what the convention is in the US,
On 1/1/15 6:00 PM, Harald Kliems wrote:
I don't think that this is a tagging but a routing problem. It seems
easy enough to me to program a router do not use roads with
access=private unless they are the first or last segment of a route
or something along those lines.
well, it is an issue
Harald Kliems kli...@gmail.com writes:
I don't think that this is a tagging but a routing problem. It seems
easy enough to me to program a router do not use roads with
access=private unless they are the first or last segment of a route
or something along those lines.
RE: access=destination.
The equivalent sign in the USA states either No Thru Traffic or Local
Traffic Only. While the standard written spelling is through, the
shortened spelling Thru is standard on road signs.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that.
15 matches
Mail list logo
