Regarding
the Great Divide Mountain Bike Route:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3161159
I have three comments:
1) The first one is that as far as I know it is not signposted, so it
should not be in OSM as a relation.
Only if the ACA have plans to put signs up, it could
Regarding the I-5 bicycle route, I looked a bit closer at this. In fact
the route is most of the time on the I-5, but at the northern end in
Portland it actually shows in detail the way cyclists need to take to avoid
the no-cycles bit of the I-5 (see
Did you leave our the word “not” from the last sentence?
Kerry
Oregon Department of Transportation publishes a bike map [1]. I5 is included in
any of their approved routes.
Clifford
--
@osm_seattle
osm_seattle.snowandsnow.us
Agree that the GD MTB route is a “private route” in that you need to obtain a
map to figure out what the route is. Whether OSM wants to document private
routes seems to be an open question.
While Adventure Cycling is proud of the routes it has developed we do not claim
them as “national
The key question here, it seems to me, is whether there is any “official” body
that claims these sections of I-5 to be a bicycle route. That might include
bike clubs if indeed OSM decides to include “private routes” in the data base.
I am not aware if any group that would suggest I-5 for a
I did! I need more coffee.. It should read:
Oregon Department of Transportation publishes a bike map. I5 is not
included in any of their approved routes.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Kerry Irons irons54vor...@gmail.com
wrote:
Did you leave our the word “not” from the last sentence?
Kerry Irons writes:
By the logic that I-5 in Oregon is tagged as a bike route, then all
roads in the US that don't prohibit bicycles should be tagged
likewise. Obviously that logic is incorrect. There is no body,
official or otherwise, that calls I-5 in Oregon a bike route.
Agreed: see
Okay, why don't we just ask the creator of the relation? I have added Paul
Johnson to the conversation -- he created the first version of the relation
and is usually quite active on this list anyway.
Paul, what was your intention with adding I5 as a bike route?
Harald.
On Sun Jan 11 2015 at
On 01/11/2015 07:32 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
However, north of the rotary for quite a while, it should just be
primary. There are intersections and lights all over the place, nothing
better than an ordinary US highwway that happens to have two lanes each
way. It's posted 40 and we really mean
(I'm writing from the perspective of having driven Route 6 from the
sagamore bridge to north eastham every summer for many years, and to
Provincetown a few years ago.)
If we're talking about where Route 6 goes from 2 lanes each direction
with a real median down to one lane in each direction with
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us
wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 7:27 AM, Kerry Irons irons54vor...@gmail.com
wrote:
The key question here, it seems to me, is whether there is any “official”
body that claims these sections of I-5 to be a bicycle route.
On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Zontine, Chris -(p) chr...@telenav.com
wrote:
While mapping a FIXME in the US this situation came up: WAY ID 8822153.
The FIXME implies this WAY (and others) should have a dual carriageway. As
you can see this is one long stretch of highway=motorway. What is
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 1:54 PM, stevea stevea...@softworkers.com wrote:
I do not agree: again, I find no evidence (from the Oregon DOT map) that
bicycles are explicitly designated legal on I-5. It may be the case that
explicit statute specifies bicycles are allowed on I-5 in Oregon, but
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 1:54 PM, stevea
mailto:stevea...@softworkers.comstevea...@softworkers.com wrote:
I do not agree: again, I find no evidence (from the Oregon DOT map)
that bicycles are explicitly designated legal on I-5. It may be
the case that explicit statute specifies bicycles are
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 8:09 PM, stevea stevea...@softworkers.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 1:54 PM, stevea stevea...@softworkers.com
wrote:
I do not agree: again, I find no evidence (from the Oregon DOT map) that
bicycles are explicitly designated legal on I-5. It may be the case
By contrast, I am not aware of any Interstate highways in the southeast USA
that allow bicycles. From my experience, every entrance ramp has signs
forbidding non-motorized traffic and mopeds.
--
John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that.
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 9:43 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com
wrote:
By contrast, I am not aware of any Interstate highways in the southeast
USA that allow bicycles. From my experience, every entrance ramp has signs
forbidding non-motorized traffic and mopeds.
John,
I think highway
17 matches
Mail list logo
