On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 1:54 PM, stevea <[email protected]> wrote:
> I do not agree: again, I find no evidence (from the Oregon DOT map) that > bicycles are explicitly designated "legal" on I-5. It may be the case that > explicit statute specifies bicycles are allowed on I-5 in Oregon, but this > map does not explicitly do so. Again, please note that no specific "bike > routes" are designated on that map, either. It simply displays some > highways as Interstates and some highways as containing wide shoulders or > narrow shoulders. While not complaining about Oregon's DOT helping > bicyclists better understand where they might or might not ride a bicycle > in that state, I characterize these map data as "early" or "underdeveloped" > w.r.t. helpful "bicycle routing" by a DOT. Oregon and Washington allow all modes on all routes unless otherwise posted. They have to explicitly sign exclusions, and they do. Here's the list for Oregon http://www.oregon.gov/ODOT/HWY/BIKEPED/docs/freeway_ban.pdf And Washington: http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/bike/closed.htm
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
