Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Nathan Mills wrote: > Typically state DOT functional classification freeway and expressway both > imply limited, but not necessarily fully controlled, access, so trunk is a > good first approximation. However, the DOT classification diverges

Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

Typically state DOT functional classification freeway and expressway both imply limited, but not necessarily fully controlled, access, so trunk is a good first approximation. However, the DOT classification diverges enough from OSM tagging standards/consensus (such as it is in the US, anyway)

Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

On Mar 5, 2017 13:35, "OSM Volunteer stevea" wrote: I would say "almost, but not quite." Interstate and Freeway, both highway=motorway. Expressway, highway=trunk. If it's semi limited access (few to no driveways, a mix of at grade and grade separated junctions), I

Re: [Talk-us] MO Stare Road Classifications.

Hi, On 03/05/2017 10:08 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote: > I'm not a vehement anti-importer (there are a few around here I don't know what you are talking about ;) > There are "county > highways" that you'd expect to be highway=tertiary that are in fact > highway=track, for instance. Or the myriad