On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 3:17 PM, Kevin Kenny
wrote:
> With that in hand, I can probably finish up New Jersey this week.
Noo Joisey is done.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
On 10/12/2017 6:54 PM, Nick Hocking wrote:
Should we (in OSM) put what the user will probably search for, the
correect (hypothetically) Redwil or should we put the "ground truth"
(REED WILL) which is what the user will see if he acually ever makes
it to that location.
Although this has
AAAH - all my questions are answered.
The City of Austin's use of google base map has "fooled" me into thinking
that the map data was theirs rather than googles. If I click on the "blue
line" then I see the actual City of Austin data and indeed it is "REED WILL
DRIVE".
Damm - So I have actually
Clifford wrote
"Looking at the data from
Austin, the road should be name Reed Will Drive."
Hi Clifford.
Which site did you find the authoritive data for Austin from? (Tiger has
nothing and is not authorative anyway, as far as I can tell)
The Cit of Austin site
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Nick Hocking
wrote:
> Nathan wrote
>
>
> has the road listed as REED WILL and with a type of DR. I've been told
> that this is an acceptable source or road names,
>
>
> Maybe somebody could drive past this road and report back what the
On 2017.10.13. 01:15, Nick Hocking wrote:
> Nathan wrote
> "Best to stay well on the correct side of the line "**//___^
> **//___^
> Ok - point taken.
yes, google so far has not flat out denied permission, but their terms
of service would make data not usable in some countries.
it's safer to do a
Nathan wrote
"Best to stay well on the correct side of the line "
Ok - point taken.
Did I mention that at the location I posted (using OSM) the CAPCOG website
(roads dataset)
http://regional-open-data-capcog.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/roads-2015
has the road listed as REED WILL and with a
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 7:47 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/chdr.details
>
> A new list (CSV file) with way id, coordinates, and country/state/county
> information. I've eliminated all objects that have been reported to be
> ok, and plan to
On 10/12/2017 9:52 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
The vast majority of roads seem to be correctly missing from OSM.
Along that line of thought - for cases where local government data is
not open, I'd find it useful to detect where a name changed in TIGER
from previous year, or a road was added.
I've just now sent an email through the school's portal to Mr. Birdsall,
asking whether he can help. I live in California, and have met folks from
Davis, but don't have enough of a personal connection to go a more direct
route.
David
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Andy Townsend
I started processing, State by State, the Tiger 2017 dataset, because i get
less errors from overpass this way then if i process in bulk of 10 states.
The first state is Alabama.It took around 5 hours to complete,and it shows
over 20.000 possible ways that are not added in OSM.
The total length
The problem as I understand it is less copyright violation (in the US, so long
as what you see in Google isn't ever put into the OSM database), and more
database licensing difficulty in the rest of the world where the law is less
permissive and even using Google to identify possible errors in
richlv wrote "just a quick reminder that we should try not to use google
maps or
streetview, the legal status of "just looking" is also fuzzy :)"
Ok, so I if want to find out what a road is called, I'm not allowed to use
a street directory to do this? This would be extremely weird.
If I am
Among rather more serious problems (smoke from the Napa wildfires) Davis
Senior High School is home to some Pokemon fans who don't like doing
their homework. http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/23646951/history has
been changed a number of times to a park labelled "Please let us drop
tests Mr.
On 2017.10.11. 13:37, Nick Hocking wrote:
> Andrew wrote "I would check out the City of Austin's OpenData portal:
> https://data.austintexas.gov/Locations-and-Maps/Street-Segment/t4fe-kr8c
>
> The license is the same (PD) as when the initial building import was
> completed, so you are good to
15 matches
Mail list logo