2013/7/26 Mike Thompson miketh...@gmail.com
If we want to make the map explicit as to the difficulty of foot travel,
then we should have a tag that can be applied to an area indicating this.
Perhaps it isn't sac_scale, but we should have something.
the only established tags for areas I am
On 23/lug/2013, at 03:04, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Thomas, I'd caution against placing nodes every mile and tagging them
highway=milestone unless there's something more notable about them. Mile
markers could be computed from the length of the way and all the extra data
might
On 21/lug/2013, at 22:26, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
If it has more than an exceptionally rare at-grade junction, it should be a
trunk. If it's not divided, it should be a trunk even if it doesn't have
at-grade junctions.
for what it's worth, in Germany and Italy we use
2013/7/2 Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org
There are actually several approaches suggested on the Bridge wiki on how
to tag bridge names[1]. The above cases represent the first approach: using
the name tag. This may not be appropriate everywhere, however: if the road
running across the bridge
, and you can easily adopt it to your
area:
https://ifttt.com/recipes/44673
Every time a new user edits in your defined bounding box you'll get an
email.
cheers,
Martin
--
Martin Koppenhoefer (Dipl-Ing. Arch.)
Via del Santuario Regina degli Apostoli, 18
00145 Roma
|I|I|I
On 22/giu/2013, at 17:42, Kevin Kenny kken...@nycap.rr.com wrote:
and we can use that to inform our local decisions.
But let the locals make the decisions! Don't just go deleting
hamlets based on the fact that they are unincorporated. A great many
hamlets in New York State have a strong
2013/6/17 Anthony o...@inbox.org
It's not about mapping the sign, it's about mapping the neighborhood based
on the sign.
We don't map speed limit signs, we map the speed limits on the roads based
on the signs.
where do you get this from? We are indeed mapping speed limits signs
On 15/giu/2013, at 21:16, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
What are you using to verify your neighborhood boundaries? Is there literally
a line on the pavement showing the boundaries?
the boundaries of settlements and parts of them often follow natural and or man
made limits
On 15/giu/2013, at 00:28, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
To this end, I propose removing v1 imported ways/multipolygons from FMMP
with FMMP_modified=no, FMMP_reviewed=no, landuse=residential, and either
description=other land or description=urban land, starting with ways about
500
On 15/giu/2013, at 11:13, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
Some of the multipolygons I've been cleaning up have been particularly hard
to edit as they cover multiple separate areas. I'd hate to handle them in
P2 or iD, fetching a small area from the API returns these giant ways and
or addr:full for addresses that don't fit into our
standard addressing scheme. See the wiki for more info.
cheers,
Martin
--
Martin Koppenhoefer (Dipl-Ing. Arch.)
Via del Santuario Regina degli Apostoli, 18
00145 Roma
|I|I|I|I|I|I|I|I
like osm, where you
always have missing information bits).
Cheers,
Martin
--
Martin Koppenhoefer (Dipl-Ing. Arch.)
Via del Santuario Regina degli Apostoli, 18
00145 Roma
|I|I|I|I|I|I|I|I|
Italia
N41.851, E12.4824
tel1: +39
2013/6/14 Steven Johnson sejohns...@gmail.com
To amplify what Serge said about Washington, no distinction was made for
the behind-the-house, 1-2 vehicle private space versus large public lots.
So if you were to look at the WashDC map, you'd be misled into thinking
there is parking everywhere!
2013/6/12 stevea stevea...@softworkers.com
Is Jane Street (NYC) in Chelsea or Greenwich Village? Well, kind of
both. This is where nodes work better.
well, they could also overlap (so you could see from the polygons that
there is a certain area which somehow belongs to both neighbourhoods
On 11/giu/2013, at 21:07, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
Often, I can't determine the subdivision boundary from either Bing or a
survey; I'd need to see an organization map which would be of questionable
license.
or ask the people that live there, would that be feasible?
cheers,
Martin
2013/6/5 KerryIrons irons54vor...@sbcglobal.net
3 months ago we discussed the existence of US Bicycle Route number tags in
the Midwest. The OSM consensus was clear: only approved US Bicycle Routes
should be tagged in OSM.
Since those routes (21, 25, 50, 80, 84 and 35 in Indiana) have not
2013/6/1 Clay Smalley claysmal...@gmail.com
I've had to clean up his edits before. What bothers me is that he's
unresponsive and never leaves any comments on his edits. I've brought him
up before to DWG but nothing's been done.
Retry, being unresponsive while performing disputed edits is a
2013/5/28 Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com
If you want to be part of this community, meaning the OpenStreetMap
community in the United States, I and others would welcome you, but
you should be participatory and follow the guidelines that this
community (the DWG and then the US Community)
On 26/mag/2013, at 13:03, Paweł Paprota ppa...@fastmail.fm wrote:
Well of course when you put osm in the search query you will get results
from OSM.org... but it kind of defeats the purpose - the point is to promote
OSM to people who don't know about it, isn't it?
you only get these
2013/5/20 Alex Barth a...@openstreetmap.us
OpenStreetMap.us relaunched today. Head over to http://openstreetmap.usand
check it out.
I think it really looks great!
Some issues I think could be addressed:
1. There seems to be no link to openstreetmap.org on the front page. I'd
suggest to
2013/5/12 stevea stevea...@softworkers.com
Yes, it seems confusing, but only if you think landuse=forest implies
all trees. It doesn't: it implies all managed forest, whether with or
without trees.
Yes, basically the actual use of landuse=forest is: there are trees
(judging from how
On 12/mag/2013, at 14:04, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
So, I'd like to see a
landcover=
tag,
here it is http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/landcover
;-)
cheers,
Martin___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
, but not as forests but as kind of protected area.
cheers,
Martin
--
Martin Koppenhoefer (Dipl-Ing. Arch.)
Via del Santuario Regina degli Apostoli, 18
00145 Roma
|I|I|I|I|I|I|I|I|
Italia
N41.851, E12.4824
tel1: +39 06.916508070
2013/5/10 Jason Remillard remillard.ja...@gmail.com
Hi,
I have an RC field in my town.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/154081216
I just marked it has a private park, included its name, and the web
site for the club that runs the field.
there is also sport
2013/4/23 Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com
* Rick Marshall rick.marsh...@verticalgeo.com [2013-04-23 12:37 -0500]:
1. How do you mark Precision Approach Path Indicator (PAPI), Visual
Approach Slope Indicator (VASI), VOR, and other Navigational Aids at
airports.
As far as I know, there isn't
On 22/apr/2013, at 02:55, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Paragraph 5 states: 'UTA grants You a limited, revocable license to use,
reproduce, and redistribute UTA’s Web Services API (“Data”) in accordance
with the terms of this section
if the permission to distribute is
2013/4/5 Kushal Khan kus...@foodinhood.com
I know neighborhood distinctions can be a very subjective issue, but the
current info on openstreetmaps is materially inaccurate. I love the concept
of your site and want to contribute.
get yourself an account and correct the data, its a wiki map
2013/3/23 Paul Norman penor...@mac.com:
It’s worth noting that source:maxspeed=sign is the most common value. I
looked at the last-touched authors for a couple of the country:region values
and for sign and survey and it was my impression that sign and survey had a
wider distribution of users
Hi folk,
I'm a mapper from Italy since 2008 but registered to this list only
now, mainly to post this. Some mappers, apparently from the US, are
using the key source:maxspeed to add metadata (the way the data was
collected and/or the source of the data) to the database.
Unfortunately this tag is
2013/3/21 Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:28 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
The general usage is according to the wiki:
distinguish between implicit and explicit speed limits (i.e. the
default maxspeed in the context (urban, rural, motorway
101 - 130 of 130 matches
Mail list logo
