On 8/31/20 4:12 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
And in my view, tagging something as "desirable to go there" via a
tourism=* tag, no matter how many
access=no/private/only_under_cover_of_darkness we add to that, that
would be disingenious.
Not so much "disingenuous" as misleading. Tourism implies
New Hampshire has a law requiring the town council of every town to hike
the perimeter of the town once every seven years. They can appoint an
agent to do it. I did one of these hikes, between Henniker and Weare.
There are markers along the way, which we re-painted, or otherwise
renewed.
On 9/1/20 3:08 PM, Bill Ricker wrote:
Tourist Safety is dubiously best as most of the handrails and safety
lines are gone
s/dubiously best/dubious at best/ ?
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Well there you go! You should make a page on the Wiki under Imports, and
save this email there. So it doesn't get lost. Like my NYSDEC email did. :(
On 7/18/20 12:34 PM, Skyler Hawthorne wrote:
Well, it turned it to be a lot easier than I was thinking it would be!
I reached out to the contact
I have done this in the area around Potsdam, NY. Assigning the address
to the centroid of all the points that describe the parcel works quite
well. It's not perfect, though. Look at May Road. I've entered addresses
there in three different ways:
o On the building as an area, traced by hand
It was an experiment, to see how accurate the three methods could be.
That road, and many around it, are not completely built-out. When a new
building is built on an empty parcel, it will have an address
immediately. When a new address is assigned to a new (split out)
parcel, the
On 6/14/20 6:34 PM, Chuck Sanders wrote:
after watching the re-discussion of the abandoned railroad line "where
do we draw the line" topic, from a somewhat-outside perspective,
I've given up arguing. I treat deletion of abandoned railways as
vandalism and just fix it. Not seeing something is
On 6/10/20 7:21 PM, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us wrote:
I am not a native speaker, but as far as I know "freak" is pejorative
and quite strong
slur.
It's not necessarily negative. It's a description of someone who is
enthralled by something. In context, it could be negative or positive. I
On 6/13/20 12:30 AM, Natfoot wrote:
And I don't trust the FRA database to be accurate.
No database is perfect. Not even OSM. Some databases can be useful.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
On 6/13/20 12:25 AM, stevea wrote:
It is absolutely fascinating (to me, anyway) to watch this conversation!
I thanked Russ Nelson on wiki for his comments at New York/Railroads. (And we
still have a ways to go there).
Yeah, for me the map is much more important than the wiki. Except for
On 7/16/20 5:26 AM, Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us wrote:
On the other hand, it may be unoriginal database... Still, the
preferred version is to have an explicit
license.
I tried getting some acknowledgement from New York State GIS that their
data was not copyrighted or not copyrightable back
On 7/16/20 10:33 AM, Rory McCann wrote:
On 16/07/2020 13:35, Russell Nelson wrote:
As you say, it's just a listing of facts about the world. At most the
presentation of them is copyrightable, but as Skyler noted, he's
changing the presentation.
No license needed for facts.
Remember
12 matches
Mail list logo
