On 8/31/20 4:12 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
And in my view, tagging something as "desirable to go there" via a tourism=* tag, no matter how many access=no/private/only_under_cover_of_darkness we add to that, that would be disingenious.
Not so much "disingenuous" as misleading. Tourism implies you can go there, yet clearly you cannot. Access=no if it's not reasonable to get there, or access=private if the owner doesn't want you to go there, should be a reason for leaving off tourism=.
Maybe the problem is the name of the tag? Tag names can be misleading. They aren't just metadata.
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
