Re: [Talk-us] Recent Aerial Photo Imagery Changes

2017-09-26 Thread Mark Wagner
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 11:07:55 +0300 Rihards wrote: > On 2017.09.26. 03:09, David Wisbey wrote: > > Fellow mappers, > > > > So what's up with the recent changes in our aerial photo imagery? > > > > It used to be so simple and I followed the rule(?) of making sure > > features

Re: [Talk-us] Recent Aerial Photo Imagery Changes

2017-09-26 Thread Volker Schmidt
> ... it has always been > suggested to check and align them to gps traces from the area (while > keeping in mind that one or few traces might be all wrong, the centre > line of many traces being the best). > This is certainly the best advice (unless you are in an area with high buildings or

Re: [Talk-us] Recent Aerial Photo Imagery Changes

2017-09-26 Thread Rihards
On 2017.09.26. 03:09, David Wisbey wrote: > Fellow mappers, > > So what's up with the recent changes in our aerial photo imagery? > > It used to be so simple and I followed the rule(?) of making sure features > line up with Bing imagery. I'm wondering about that now - big time. > I have been

[Talk-us] Recent Aerial Photo Imagery Changes

2017-09-25 Thread David Wisbey
Fellow mappers, So what's up with the recent changes in our aerial photo imagery? It used to be so simple and I followed the rule(?) of making sure featuresline up with Bing imagery.  I'm wondering about that now - big time.I have been mapping in a variety of locations lately and the situation