Re: [Talk-us] Per-State relations for the Appalachian Trail

Kevin Kenny > writes: > Breaking apart the AT into separate relations - ideally with a superrelation > joining them - would be sensible, I think, but be careful about the > assumption about state lines. The AT literally spends a good many miles

Re: [Talk-us] Per-State relations for the Appalachian Trail

On 5/4/16 9:54 AM, Elliott Plack wrote: > Thanks for all of the feedback. I definitely won't be merging any > relations based on some of what you have all stated. What I will do is > go through and look at each relation state by state to ensure there is > connectivity and what not. I'll update

Re: [Talk-us] Per-State relations for the Appalachian Trail

Thanks for all of the feedback. I definitely won't be merging any relations based on some of what you have all stated. What I will do is go through and look at each relation state by state to ensure there is connectivity and what not. I'll update anything of interest here. On Tue, May 3, 2016 at

Re: [Talk-us] Per-State relations for the Appalachian Trail

On 05/03/2016 03:09 PM, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote: In the USA, partly because we are such a geographically large part of the North American continent and partly because each of our fifty states is sovereign, I find that breaking apart very large relations so they are across a single state at

Re: [Talk-us] Per-State relations for the Appalachian Trail

In the USA, partly because we are such a geographically large part of the North American continent and partly because each of our fifty states is sovereign, I find that breaking apart very large relations so they are across a single state at a time (then perhaps these are collected into a

Re: [Talk-us] Per-State relations for the Appalachian Trail

What about just combining the relations for selected states where the AT crosses back and forth across the state border, like TN/NC and VA/WV? On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > > > On May 2, 2016, at 9:49 AM, Mike N wrote: > > > > On

Re: [Talk-us] Per-State relations for the Appalachian Trail

> On May 2, 2016, at 9:49 AM, Mike N wrote: > > On 5/2/2016 11:41 AM, Elliott Plack wrote: >> This got me thinking, is there any specific need to have the route >> broken up by state? Unlike interstate highways, where maintenance >> changes across state lines, at the border,

Re: [Talk-us] Per-State relations for the Appalachian Trail

On 5/2/2016 11:41 AM, Elliott Plack wrote: This got me thinking, is there any specific need to have the route broken up by state? Unlike interstate highways, where maintenance changes across state lines, at the border, the AT maintenance is handled by a trifecta of federal agencies and a

[Talk-us] Per-State relations for the Appalachian Trail

I've been doing some mapping along the Maryland portions of the Appalachian Trail lately and noticed many issues along Maryland's section as well as nearby Virginia and West Virginia where the route relations were not continuous or overlapped other states'. Strava's slide has been quite helpful in