On Fri May 31 23:48:45 UTC 2013, Paul Norman penorman at mac.com wrote:
The full text of the DWG recommendation to the board is available at
http://www.osmfoundation.org/wiki/File:DWG_NE2_Turn_Restriction_dispute.pdf
but the executive summary is as follows:
I missed this thread until now, so
On 6/12/2013 7:53 AM, Josh Doe wrote:
I'm
disappointed that the above recommendation didn't acknowledge that NE2
has done good work. I would say that on the whole his contributions in
terms of data are definitely a net positive, including a great deal of
geometry improvement, addition of new
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 08:34:18 -0400
From: nice...@att.net
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Turn restriction dispute, NE2
On 6/12/2013 7:53 AM, Josh Doe wrote:
I'm
disappointed that the above recommendation didn't acknowledge that NE2
has done good work. I would
Well, on the flip side, there's also been some serious damage from torquing
the primary and trunk tags on an indiscriminate nationwide basis that's
still in the process of being fixed two years later.
On Jun 12, 2013 8:49 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
I had some positive
After a delay the DWG and OSMF have reached conclusions on the case
involving a turn restriction dispute between Paul Johnson and NE2 that was
referred to it by Paul Johnson, NE2, and multiple other members of the
community. This decision took an extended amount of time due to the
investigation
5 matches
Mail list logo