Re: [Talk-us] natural=* and landuse=* multipolygons at the urban interface

2017-08-15 Thread Tod Fitch
<david.t.kew...@gmail.com <mailto:david.t.kew...@gmail.com>>; > Rihards <ric...@nakts.net <mailto:ric...@nakts.net>>; Steve Friedl > <st...@unixwiz.net <mailto:st...@unixwiz.net>> > Subject: Re: [Talk-us] natural=* and landuse=* multipolygons at the urban &

Re: [Talk-us] natural=* and landuse=* multipolygons at the urban interface

2017-08-14 Thread Paul Norman
On 8/13/2017 4:34 PM, Steve Friedl wrote: You’re right that splitting this up is the right approach, because I don’t believe having all this as one huge relation was every the right thing to do as I cannot see how the related-ness of all the scrub patches in a very wide area is useful

Re: [Talk-us] natural=* and landuse=* multipolygons at the urban interface

2017-08-14 Thread Nathan Mixter
Steve is indeed correct. ID isn't really designed as an editor of complex relations since it is browser based. In JOSM, you can select the relation and all the members and easily see how the elements interact. That being said, it is fine to simplify the FMMP relationships by splitting them into

Re: [Talk-us] natural=* and landuse=* multipolygons at the urban interface

2017-08-13 Thread OSM Volunteer stevea
David, I would contact Nathan Mixter directly (in OSM, nmixter, import account Eureka gold) and ask him what he thinks, as he is (largely speaking) the original importer of these (and many other, very large) imports, many of which, unfortunately generated consternation or reversion. You might

Re: [Talk-us] natural=* and landuse=* multipolygons at the urban interface

2017-08-13 Thread Steve Friedl
| Southern California | Windows Guy | unixwiz.net From: David Kewley [mailto:david.t.kew...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2017 1:12 PM To: OpenStreetMap talk-us list <talk-us@openstreetmap.org> Subject: [Talk-us] natural=* and landuse=* multipolygons at the urban interface Devel

Re: [Talk-us] natural=* and landuse=* multipolygons at the urban interface

2017-08-13 Thread Rihards
On 2017.08.13. 23:11, David Kewley wrote: > Development in Orange County, California pushes into areas currently > covered by polygons (often large multipolygons) tagged as natural=scrub, > landuse=meadow, or landuse=[farm|farmland]. These were part of the FMMP > import

[Talk-us] natural=* and landuse=* multipolygons at the urban interface

2017-08-13 Thread David Kewley
Development in Orange County, California pushes into areas currently covered by polygons (often large multipolygons) tagged as natural=scrub, landuse=meadow, or landuse=[farm|farmland]. These were part of the FMMP import http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/California_Farms. Mostly I try to leave