<david.t.kew...@gmail.com <mailto:david.t.kew...@gmail.com>>;
> Rihards <ric...@nakts.net <mailto:ric...@nakts.net>>; Steve Friedl
> <st...@unixwiz.net <mailto:st...@unixwiz.net>>
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] natural=* and landuse=* multipolygons at the urban
&
On 8/13/2017 4:34 PM, Steve Friedl wrote:
You’re right that splitting this up is the right approach, because I don’t
believe having all this as one huge relation was every the right thing to do as
I cannot see how the related-ness of all the scrub patches in a very wide area
is useful
Steve is indeed correct. ID isn't really designed as an editor of
complex relations since it is browser based. In JOSM, you can select
the relation and all the members
and easily see how the elements interact. That being said, it is fine
to simplify the FMMP relationships by splitting them into
David, I would contact Nathan Mixter directly (in OSM, nmixter, import account
Eureka gold) and ask him what he thinks, as he is (largely speaking) the
original importer of these (and many other, very large) imports, many of which,
unfortunately generated consternation or reversion. You might
| Southern California | Windows Guy | unixwiz.net
From: David Kewley [mailto:david.t.kew...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 13, 2017 1:12 PM
To: OpenStreetMap talk-us list <talk-us@openstreetmap.org>
Subject: [Talk-us] natural=* and landuse=* multipolygons at the urban interface
Devel
On 2017.08.13. 23:11, David Kewley wrote:
> Development in Orange County, California pushes into areas currently
> covered by polygons (often large multipolygons) tagged as natural=scrub,
> landuse=meadow, or landuse=[farm|farmland]. These were part of the FMMP
> import
Development in Orange County, California pushes into areas currently
covered by polygons (often large multipolygons) tagged as natural=scrub,
landuse=meadow, or landuse=[farm|farmland]. These were part of the FMMP
import http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/California_Farms.
Mostly I try to leave
7 matches
Mail list logo