a local SEO company in Gainesville. I'm not sure
what to do about it, i.e. I'm not sure what the protocol is for this
type of situation and I've never attempted a revert before. Can someone
review this and revert it?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/11624008
Thanks,
Brian May
aka
+1
Nick, maybe as a step before your suggestion.
1) New streets with no names. In Florida, there's a large number of new
streets that contributors have added, but did not add a name. The TIGER
2012 overlay helps make quick work of adding these names. In many cases,
streets will need to be
On 9/29/2012 5:33 PM, the Old Topo Depot wrote:
Statements that we should fix all the unedited TIGER data express a
Great Idea. They are, however, rather ambitious statements, and will
require more than a few weeks to completely realize. As such,
cleaning up US TIGER data is a Long Term
I agree, but I would suggest we start with larger metro areas that still
require a lot of tiger cleanup. Not many people are going to notice
tiger cleanup in rural West Virginia.
In Florida, examples of populous counties that started out with horrible
tiger with major work still required:
On 11/27/2012 7:06 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Josh Doe j...@joshdoe.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
The tiger.py file contains TIGER specific expansion code, and the
selection process is quite
On 11/27/2012 11:33 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Brian May b...@mapwise.com wrote:
Another clarification for this use case:
A user changes the original highway name tag from Main St SW to SW Main
Street, but did not alter the tiger tags.
Brian,
Thank you
On 11/28/2012 6:35 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
Hi folks,
So SteveC's blog post sparked a bit of conversation today:
http://stevecoast.com/2012/11/28/openstreetmap-addressable/
I'd love to see OSM US lead the way on collecting high quality
addressing data from as many places as possible and throw it
On 11/28/2012 8:10 PM, Jeff Meyer wrote:
Does anyone have any success stories of asking localities to open up
previously copyrighted data? I'm going down the just ask nicely for
*really* open data path here in Seattle, but have yet to hear back
from the authorities. It seems that having a list
On 11/29/2012 1:11 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 11/29/12 1:03 PM, Steven Johnson wrote:
The
data are copyrighted and Arlington County owns all rights to the data
and
allows use ...as an acknowledged source to produce maps or analysis but
you may not redistribute, resell, or copy the data
PM, Brian May b...@mapwise.com
mailto:b...@mapwise.com wrote:
On 11/29/2012 1:11 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 11/29/12 1:03 PM, Steven Johnson wrote:
The
data are copyrighted and Arlington County owns all
rights to the data
On 11/29/2012 9:33 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 11/29/12 9:26 PM, Steven Johnson wrote:
Several people have responded with examples of state/local address
data to
import into OSM. Are these address *points* or address *ranges*?
my plan is to obtain permission to import, where available, the
On 11/29/2012 9:12 PM, Steven Johnson wrote:
Secondly, about Census data... The Census Bureau publishes ZIP Code
Tabulation Areas (ZCTAs, as polygons) but they are an approximation of
US Postal Service data and used for downstream analytical purposes.
But as far as USPS is concerned, the ZIP
On 11/29/2012 10:45 PM, Mike N wrote:
On 11/29/2012 10:32 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Is there a compelling reason not to get parcels instead? As parcels
change shape, the centroid can be easily interpolated. It's not really
possible to extrapolate geometry from centroid, however.
It would be
Here's an interesting exercise so you can see how google is doing
address geocoding. In google maps, search for: 2109 Lisa Dare Dr,
Leesburg, FL
Make sure you have the map version turned on so you can see the parcel
outlines. See the address location? Its the parcel centroid.
Now look at
On 12/28/2012 4:47 PM, Phil! Gold wrote:
* Jason Remillard remillard.ja...@gmail.com [2012-12-28 16:16 -0500]:
So the question is, what should the exact criteria be for including an
open space parcel in OSM. Consider some of the various types of
property.
I've used parcel data as a layer in
On 2/14/2013 3:43 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
Before this discussion moves forward we should define what parcel
data is. In my mind it's mostly-abutting polygons representing land
ownership. Usually it comes with metadata about tax information and
ownership information, and sometimes it has address
On 2/21/2013 7:27 PM, Brian Cavagnolo wrote:
Hey guys,
In a previous thread on parcel data, some people expressed interest in
participating in creating some sort of open repository for parcel
data. I was imagining a conference call or something to discuss next
steps, but I think we can advance
public domain, unless
other restrictions are applied, e.g. the census bureau doesn't release the
individual address points they collected due to some kind of privacy law. USGS
has been using contractors for years to update their mapping data, and all that
data is public domain.
Brian May
I just ran into an area where someone tagged streets with source=google
maps. Looks like an un-aware new user who only had 8 changesets over two
days and that was it. What to do about this?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Hercumike/edits
Brian
The USPS site referenced below has zipcode polygons and postal delivery
routes overlaid on an interactive map along with the number of
residences and business each route serves. Search for a zipcode or an
address to get started.
https://eddm.usps.com/eddm/customer/routeSearch.action
It looks
On 3/15/2015 8:53 AM, Clifford Snow wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 7:56 PM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com
mailto:a...@mapbox.com wrote:
Here's a map showing where TIGER is better than OSM:
and licensing has to be vetted, but it just simply does not
make sense to replicate all that work. Especially since we have proven
methods for importing that data without damaging existing data.
Brian May aka grouper
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us
of stuff.
Brian May aka grouper
[1] GEOSPATIAL DATA: Progress Needed on Identifying Expenditures,
Building and Utilizing a Data Infrastructure, and Reducing Duplicative
Efforts
http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/668494.pdf
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk
On 8/18/2015 10:01 AM, Torsten Karzig wrote:
As mentioned earlier part of the problem is a confusion between tagging what is
there (landcover) and what it is used for (landuse). In the wiki we actually
have a consistent approach (Approach 1) to make this distinction. Using
natural=wood as a
I agree with the pro-import comments and say go for it. After re-reading
your original post, I feel you are very well suited to the task and are
obviously very contentious about the process. Don't let one strong
negative comment get you down. OSM needs people like you to help make
the map
Been following the thread - my two cents on what I'm seeing around Florida.
1) Seems like a major increase in new mappers and edits in just the past
two weeks, and before that an increase overall since the pokemon / osm
connection was publicized.
2) Many /most of the influx of new mappers are
A couple ideas:
Start with small rural towns near you. Check to make sure the streets
are aligned properly to Bing. Check road names against recent tiger,
county GIS, and of course the best is on the verifying with your own
eyes. Then clean up tracks (dirt roads, 4wd trails, non-existent
On 7/26/2017 4:05 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 10:48 AM, Bryan Housel wrote:
2. contact state GIS agencies for permission, if the website does not make
license clear
I have contact information, which I'm not going to share here.
A template for the
On 5/15/2017 7:37 AM, Eric Ladner wrote:
On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 2:59 AM Frederik Ramm > wrote:
Hi,
Maybe someone in the area fancies a fact-finding mission ;)
Some of it actually shows up in the Charlotte county GIS system[1]
(the
I used that MapBox form a couple months ago to notify missing OSM
attribution for the WunderMap at wunderground.com, e.g.
https://www.wunderground.com/wundermap?lat=27.17=-80.29=1
Just checked and no changes. I'm pretty sure its an OSM basemap due to
checking features I have added that aren't
...@charter.net wrote:
If you close the All Layers window it appears in the lower right, just
like on the other implementations on their site. Is this what you are
looking for?
Joe
*From: *Brian May <mailto:b...@mapwise.com>
*Sent: *Monday, June 12, 2017 9:38 AM
*To: *t
Joe,
Try whodidit. http://simon04.dev.openstreetmap.org/whodidit/
It shows who edited areas by tile and when. Default is a week, but you
can set different times, filter users, etc.
I have a bookmark set to start at my home town location like:
On 9/30/2017 3:19 AM, Mark Wagner wrote:
Second, many entries have their coordinates specified using the old NAD
27 datum, but somewhere along the line, that fact was lost and the
coordinates were assumed to be in either NAD 83 or WGS 84. This
results in an offset that increases the further you
On 9/29/2017 11:06 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 9:33 PM, Mark Bradley
> wrote:
In the course of my mapping in the American Midwest, I have come
across several small country churches of GNIS origin that
Calling all TIGER fixup junkies. I've been poking around the coastal
areas of Texas where Hurricane Harvey is expected to make landfall and
seeing a lot of TIGER fixup needed. More and more websites depend on OSM
so it would be nice to provide more accurate and updated info than what
is there
:56 PM, Brian May <b...@mapwise.com
<mailto:b...@mapwise.com>> wrote:
Calling all TIGER fixup junkies. I've been poking around the
coastal areas of Texas where Hurricane Harvey is expected to make
landfall and seeing a lot of TIGER fixup needed. More and more
websites d
On Sun, Aug 27, 2017 at 3:47 PM, Brian May <b...@mapwise.com
<mailto:b...@mapwise.com>> wrote:
There is now a task in the OSM Task Manager to help coordinate the
effort at http://tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/104
<http://tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/104>
There i
Hi Andrew,
Are you on the OSM US slack channel? Tasks are being discussed there
among other things.
https://osmus-slack.herokuapp.com/
Thanks for helping with the tasks, too!
Brian
On 8/31/2017 11:09 AM, Andrew Matheny wrote:
NOAA has released some post-Harvey event imagery [1] in Rockport
@kevinbullock and I have started a new OSM US Task to help add buildings
to the areas around Houston hit hard by flooding. Dickinson is SE of
Houston.
#105 - Hurricane Harvey Dickinson Texas Buildings at
http://tasks.openstreetmap.us/project/105
The idea is to have some level of
Its critical to know where the lat/longs came from. For example, if they
came from Google Maps - then its a no go, because Google's licensing is
incompatible with OSM. Their geocodes are not public domain, etc. Same
thing applies to many / most other commercial geocoding services. If you
don't
I fixed up some boundaries for the Apalachicola National Forest
southwest of Tallahassee and seem to have broken the rendering of the
forest boundary and I'm not sure why. I didn't change tags, just moved
ways around, created new nodes, etc. But I did break some multi-polygon
ways and put them
On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 6:24 AM Brian May <b...@mapwise.com
<mailto:b...@mapwise.com>> wrote:
I fixed up some boundaries for the Apalachicola National Forest
southwest of Tallahassee and seem to have broken the rendering of the
forest boundary and I'm not sure why. I didn't
I have spent a very large amount of time cleaning up TIGER in rural
areas of Florida. I agree with others that the vast majority of
untouched TIGER ways in un-populated rural areas classified as
residential are forest roads for logging trucks at best and pure fantasy
at worst, with tons of
On 8/15/2018 1:47 AM, OSM Volunteer stevea wrote:
Again, one of the most important things that might be said (in talk-us) about "State Open
Data" is that there are at least fifty different sets of rules. "Check your state laws
and county practices" remains excellent advice. Yes, it can be
On 8/12/2018 4:26 PM, Kevin Kenny wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 1:05 PM OSM Volunteer stevea
wrote:
I'm not an attorney, though were I to attempt to sharpen focus on these two replies, I'd say that in
California, it's more like this: data produced by state agencies (by our state government
Alan,
Your phrase "The name tag of New York City should be an obvious example
- what would cause it to change" - That makes a lot of sense. To
further expand on this thought, identify and prioritize features in OSM
that theoretically should not change much at all over long periods of
time.
I would like to help as well. I've been mapping in Florida for many
moons, live in SE FL, and would like to get involved in imports. I think
we should consider merging the addresses with the Microsoft buildings.
As Leif mentioned, buildings from Miami-Dade county have been imported,
but they
I'm Florida based, have seen Floridaeditor's changes and noticed an
eagerness to change a lot of road classifications. I didn't pay a lot of
attention until now. Of course, trunk can be a tricky one, but if you
got one lone guy on a mission who is arguing with everyone along the
path,
48 matches
Mail list logo