Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 6:00 PM
> To: Nick Sarames; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: is this definite? was RE: The Phasing Out of Window-Eyes
>
> Their place in the market is virtually secure: they have an almost
> international monopoly on screen reader software.
>
-eyes.com] On
Behalf Of Vaughan Dodd via Talk
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 6:00 PM
To: Nick Sarames; Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: Re: is this definite? was RE: The Phasing Out of Window-Eyes
Their place in the market is virtually secure: they have an almost
international monopoly on screen
Their place in the market is virtually secure: they have an almost
international monopoly on screen reader software.
Vaughan.
On 10/15/2016 1:32 PM, Nick Sarames via Talk wrote:
It's not enough to complain, you have to find a way to show them that
this would hurt their place in the
- Original Message -
>From: darren harris via Talk
>To: 'Samuel Wilkins' ; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
>Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 4:17 PM
>Subject: is this definite? was RE: The Phasing Out of Window-Eyes
>
>
>Hi all,
>
>Is t
I agree with the others who have made comments such as "writing on the
wall" and shifts in personnel.
We should take it as fact that Window-"
Eyes development is no more. We should regard VFO as stealthy,
predatory and arrogant.
They were asked to comment, as a way of halting the
It's not enough to complain, you have to find a way to show them that
this would hurt their place in the market.
On 10/14/2016 8:30 PM, Kenneth Son via Talk wrote:
> Hello list.
>
> Start a petition and send it to this company stating you do not want to
> see Window Eyes phased out.
>
> Kenneth
Hello list.
Start a petition and send it to this company stating you do not want to
see Window Eyes phased out.
Kenneth Son.
On 10/14/2016 18:51, Chris Skarstad via Talk wrote:
No official word yet. If you want to make sure Window-eyes stays
around, please write to the VFO folks and let
No official word yet. If you want to make sure Window-eyes stays
around, please write to the VFO folks and let them know that you expect
the same type of customer service and great products as you did when ai
squared was around. This will let them know you care about the product
and that you
No official announcement has been made on the status of Window-eyes.
Some of you are so convinced it's going away, yet nothing has come down.
Why don't you wait for an official announcement before making the next
step? Or, better yet, if you *really* value Window-eyes as a
screenreader, write
I have not heard that it is. Everybody seems to be speculating. Pam.
-Original Message-
From: darren harris via Talk
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 4:17 PM
To: 'Samuel Wilkins' ; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Subject: is this definite? was RE: The Phasing Out of Window-Eyes
Hi all
it. Then I'll use NVDA.
- Original Message -
From: darren harris via Talk
To: 'Samuel Wilkins' ; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 4:17 PM
Subject: is this definite? was RE: The Phasing Out of Window-Eyes
Hi all,
Is this actual policy or are people just
No not definite, just reading writing on the wall.
On Friday, October 14, 2016, darren harris via Talk <
talk@lists.window-eyes.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is this actual policy or are people just panicking? Is wineyes going to be
> fazed out?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Talk
>
Knowing the history of FS and the fact that all the old GW staff are
either retiring or taking new jobs elsewhere I would place my bet on WE
being gone within a short time. Dam shame that the best screen reader
ever is going away.
On 10/14/2016 3:17 PM, darren harris via Talk wrote:
Hi all,
13 matches
Mail list logo
