Re: [OSM-talk] Help with way forward with Grab

2019-01-09 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
Jan 7, 2019, 3:23 PM by mish...@mishari.net: > 1. What's a fair expectation from such a mapping team? > To not make situation worse - it is unnaceptable to make much more mistakes than unpaid hobby mappers. Maybe they unable to fulfil this requirement and contract signed with Grab while

Re: [OSM-talk] Help with way forward with Grab

2019-01-09 Thread Mateusz Konieczny
Jan 7, 2019, 7:24 PM by o...@imagico.de: >> 2.2 What would even constitute as a fix by Grab? Should we ask them >> to do something like fixme=verify_on_ground on the new entries so >> that it can be ignored by the routing until verified? >> > > No - if you see a significant fraction of what

Re: [OSM-talk] Help with way forward with Grab

2019-01-08 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 7. Jan 2019, at 18:53, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > Essentially the amount of work needed to obtain a good map for bicycles is > considerably higher than for a map that will only be used for car routing. > Mapping for bicycles requires more details, like minor roads that

Re: [OSM-talk] Help with way forward with Grab

2019-01-07 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Monday 07 January 2019, Mishari Muqbil wrote: > > 1. What's a fair expectation from such a mapping team? You can and should expect at least the same level of diligence and cooperation as you can expect from an individual hobby mapper. If an individual mapper maps things incorrectly in a

Re: [OSM-talk] Help with way forward with Grab

2019-01-07 Thread John Whelan
It's a difficult call.  I do a fair amount of armchair mapping and in general I use the lowest classification of highways that looks reasonable when I add a highway,if it should be higher then I leave the change to the locals.  In general I do not delete or change tagging except when buildings