Re: [xquery-talk] Looping in Xquery

) .. But atleast i thought i would get something like short-desc100/short-desc short-desc344/short-desc ( I would have liked short-desc444/short-desc ) ANy help would be highly appreciated .. Thanks Dak. -- John Snelson, Lead Engineerhttp://twitter.com/jpcs MarkLogic Corporation

Re: [xquery-talk] map module for XQUERY ?

this function would be tremendous. Thus, to accept node() as keys for maps, one need first to provide an external ordering predicate for nodes, see point 3) above. -- John Snelson, Lead Engineerhttp://twitter.com/jpcs MarkLogic Corporation http

Re: [xquery-talk] map module for XQUERY ?

it. :-) John -- John Snelson, Lead Engineerhttp://twitter.com/jpcs MarkLogic Corporation http://www.marklogic.com ___ talk@x-query.com http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk

Re: [xquery-talk] map module for XQUERY ?

mailto:jeanmarc.merc...@gmail.com Yes you're right, using fold should be strightfroward. For the remove function, I'll try. Hopefully I won't spent too much time :) I'll keep you posted 2013/11/20 John Snelson john.snel...@marklogic.com mailto:john.snel...@marklogic.com

Re: [xquery-talk] [xml-dev] OT: Suggestion for new OSS SCC site / tool for xmlsh ? SourceForge has gone to the dark side.

. -Mike ___ talk@x-query.com http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk -- John Snelson, Lead Engineerhttp://twitter.com/jpcs MarkLogic Corporation http://www.marklogic.com

Re: [xquery-talk] map module for XQUERY ?

implementation only ever uses sequences of length 4, which will therefore have a constant cost to create (in the size of the red/black tree). John -- John Snelson, Lead Engineerhttp://twitter.com/jpcs MarkLogic Corporation http://www.marklogic.com

Re: [xquery-talk] XQuery 3.0 Grouping - Sufficiently baffled by ordering

-xquery30-FLWORExpr I suspect this is just unimplemented in eXist. John -- John Snelson, Lead Engineerhttp://twitter.com/jpcs MarkLogic Corporation http://www.marklogic.com ___ talk@x-query.com http://x-query.com

Re: [xquery-talk] Tales of the unexpected version III - Atomization

/xquery-30/#id-content John -- John Snelson, Lead Engineerhttp://twitter.com/jpcs MarkLogic Corporation http://www.marklogic.com ___ talk@x-query.com http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk

Re: [xquery-talk] Tales of the unexpected version III - Atomization

section 2.4.2 where? or was I supposed to have sussed that from seeing * Constructor expressions for various kinds of nodes if I wasI guess it's my bad. On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:29 PM, John Snelson john.snel...@marklogic.com mailto:john.snel...@marklogic.com wrote: On 08/01/14 16:25

Re: [xquery-talk] Izzit Bcos I is functional?

one. John -- John Snelson, Lead Engineerhttp://twitter.com/jpcs MarkLogic Corporation http://www.marklogic.com ___ talk@x-query.com http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk

Re: [xquery-talk] Empty or Null Array?

. Similarly the CurlyArrayConstructor for a ? on it's Expr so it can be left out. Thus you can also use array{} for an empty array. John -- John Snelson, Lead Engineerhttp://twitter.com/jpcs MarkLogic Corporation http://www.marklogic.com

Re: [xquery-talk] Error when using predicate after arrow operator

"[" beyond end of query > > whereas the pre-XQuery 3.1 approach: > > tokenize("1.2.3", "\.")[. < "3"] > > returns the results I'd expect: > >("1", "2") > > T

Re: [xquery-talk] tail recursive identity transformation

lt return $node >>> }) >>> }; >>> >>> The idea is that functions that do more than return their input >>> could be based on the function, and benefit from tail call >>> optimization. >>> >>> Kendall >>> >>> >>>

Re: [xquery-talk] Arrow Operator to a Partially Applied Function

skype: adam.retter tweet: adamretter http://www.adamretter.org.uk ___ talk@x-query.com<mailto:talk@x-query.com> http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com ___ talk@x-query.com<mailto:talk@x-query.com> http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk -- John Snelson, Principal Engineer http://twitter.com/jpcs MarkLogic Corporation http://www.marklogic.com ___ talk@x-query.com http://x-query.com/mailman/listinfo/talk

Re: [xquery-talk] Arrow Operator to a Partially Applied Function

Ah - it's a precedence problem. Try putting the partial apply in parentheses: function($k, $v) { "$k=" || $k } => (map:for-each( map { "a" : "1", "b" : "2", "c" : "3"