Re: [Taps] What about draft-moncaster-tsvwg-transport-services ?

2016-01-31 Thread Michael Welzl
this makes a lot of sense to me Sent from my iPhone > On 31. jan. 2016, at 16.05, go...@erg.abdn.ac.uk wrote: > > I think documents that describe how the IETF got to decisions can be > useful, providing useful insights to why things emerged. > > However, I think they are more usefully

Re: [Taps] What about draft-moncaster-tsvwg-transport-services ?

2016-01-31 Thread Michael Welzl
Perfectly fine by me to incorporate that! The main question on the table is: provided that we'll incorporate such comments, should this be a product of the WG? You say “this might be a useful document”, so I take that as a “yes” from you… Cheers, Michael > On 31. jan. 2016, at 05.12, Joe Touch