This one's got me beat. I just received an e-mail from a someone, that should
not (and I can confirm *does not*) have any relation to anyone in my address
book or any other filter. Yet, this message was filtered to an incoming folder
for which I *do* have a filter configured. The "Return Path" cont
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, March 13, 2003, Marek Mikus wrote...
> And now TB displayed error "Invalid floating pointer operation",
> when I deleted messages with Del key.
I get this if I hold down the delete key for too long, when I am
deleting a lot of mails. Pro
Hello all,
Saturday, January 18, 2003, Marek Mikus wrote:
MM>>> during deleting mails from Trash, TB displayed following AV error:
MM>>> "Access Violation at address 0072BD34 in module 'thebat.exe'. read
MM>>> of address 0382A820"
>> Can't confirm.
> TB displayed me this error once only and t
Hello Ethan,
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 14:21:35 -0500 GMT (14/03/03, 02:21 +0700 GMT),
Ethan J. Mings wrote:
> I enjoy reading about all of the wishes. However, any news on a fix to
> the bugs in Beta 7 before we add to the list of "new things"?
Thank you! I started thinking I am the only one not o
The Bat! Beta List
Subject: A quite cry for the bug fix
--
I enjoy reading about all of the wishes. However, any news on a fix to
the bugs in Beta 7 before we add to the list of "new things"?
Jerry
--
Powered by The Bat! 1.63 Beta/7
operating on Windows XPService Pack 1,Build 2600
Eth
Hello Jonathan,
> The thread, and one of the ideas posted by another member of the list
> was certainly interesting. An idea proposed wouldn't be to nest
> filters, but to provide a filter that had a "Jump to" option.
:-)))
I really believe it should be easy to implement and would serve the
pu
Hello Philippe,
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 17:06:02 +0100 GMT (13/03/03, 23:06 +0700 GMT),
Philippe Gouillou wrote:
TF>> But that is hierarchical, not chronological. Or am I am still getting
TF>> you wrong?
> I do not think so : chronological was a wrong word to tell
> what I wanted to,
Hi,
Philippe Gouillou wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
> I wasn't clear. The idea is that, as it is now, the filters
> apply following the orders of lines (1st line = 1st filter)
> with, as it is now, an option "Continue processing with other
> filters".
> The idea
Bonjour,
Thu, 13 Mar 2003 23:02:57 +0700, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
>> the order of filter is : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and only if 2 doesn't
>> match 3 and 4 aren't applied.
TF> But that is hierarchical, not chronological. Or am I am still getting
TF> you wrong?
I do not think so : chr
Bonjour,
Thu, 13 Mar 2003 09:36:54 -0600, Jonathan Angliss wrote:
JA> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
JA> Hash: SHA1
JA> On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, Philippe Gouillou wrote...
>>Would it be possible to have heritable sub-filters ?
JA> Interestingly enough, I proposed the same idea
Hello Philippe,
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003 11:21:17 +0100 GMT (13/03/03, 17:21 +0700 GMT),
Philippe Gouillou wrote:
> Hum : even after a lot of coffee I'm unable to imagine how to
> program it ! :-)
After two beers I'm not any better either. ;-)
>>>and of course a chronological use of
Bonjour,
Thu, 13 Mar 2003 10:45:30 +0700, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
>>Would it be possible to have heritable sub-filters ?
>>In clear, I think it would be easier to manage huge numbers of
>>filters (I've spent 2h1/2 on this today) if we could have them
>>like that :
TF> [snip]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, March 12, 2003, Philippe Gouillou wrote...
>Would it be possible to have heritable sub-filters ?
Interestingly enough, I proposed the same idea a few weeks ago. The
reason I suggested it is because I use procmail for server side
fil
Hi Peter,
on Wed, 12 Mar 2003 19:45:35 -0500GMT (13.03.03, 01:45 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
PK> If the typed line continues to the right, I get the "horizontal
PK> bar". But sometimes the mouse pointer goes over more and the
PK> beginning of the line disappears without t
14 matches
Mail list logo
