Re: IMAP fine tune - cosmetic glitch

2004-12-02 Thread David Prodinger
hello there! CW Hi all, CW On looking at the fine tune options, I spotted a cosmetic glitch (see CW attached). CW Can anyone else confirm? confirmed! yours, dave -- Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2

Re: IMAP fine tune - cosmetic glitch

2004-12-02 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Chris, On 02-12-2004 08:46, you [CW] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: CW On looking at the fine tune options, I spotted a cosmetic glitch CW (see attached). CW Can anyone else confirm? Yup. -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 3.0.1.33 Pro /thebat

Re: IMAP fine tune - cosmetic glitch

2004-12-02 Thread Markus Gloede
Hi, Chris wrote: Can anyone else confirm? Confirmed. Regards, Markus Current beta is 3.0.2.10 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link

bug with mail ticker - browse mail window

2004-12-02 Thread David Prodinger
hello all! I noticed one bug (malfunction): If I get an email, the Mail Ticker opens and scrolls it's content on top of my screen. I double click to read the mail, it opens in the Browse Mail window. No problem till here. But if I hit reply now (in the browse mail window), write an

Re: Unable to run on Windows 95

2004-12-02 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Paul, Wednesday, December 1, 2004, 5:27:06 PM, you wrote: According to http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifewin even Windows 98 is now over two years past it's mainstream support period. The extended support period (security updates via Windows Update etc.) for Win98/ME ends June 2006.

Re[2]: Annual fee or pay for major releases? (was: Just some stupid remark)

2004-12-02 Thread Gonalo Farias
KK On 2004-11-28 (16:48), you wrote: but couldn't we just wait until we get some actual facts? KK Among rumours and legends there are self-fulfilling predictions. Personally I find that an annual fee wouldn't be a fair price and could increase piracy which is, normally, why most people

Re: Annual fee or pay for major releases? (was: Just some stupid remark)

2004-12-02 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Gonalo! On Tuesday, November 30, 2004 at 10:12:59 AM you wrote: Personally I find that an annual fee wouldn't be a fair price How's that? In my experience most people find prices higher than zero unfair, at least for some things: Geiz ist geil! (Meanness is cool!) as one big

Re[2]: beta/10

2004-12-02 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Henk, Wednesday, December 01, 2004, 14:10:46, you wrote: tried that but got an AV at address 007735CD in module the bat.exe. Read of address We will fix it completely in the next beta only :-(( -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutinmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re[2]: Unable to run on Windows 95

2004-12-02 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Jernej, Wednesday, December 01, 2004, 18:06:26, you wrote: It's probably time to upgrade your OS - Windows 95 is 9 years old, Not a problem, we've called an extreme API call which Windows 95 doesn't support. Wan't be calling in in the next beta! -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutin

Re: beta/10

2004-12-02 Thread Stuart Hemming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 MM We will fix it completely in the next beta only :-(( Why the sad face? I don't think that anyone expected a fix without a beta release. Or did you /mean/ something else? - -- Stuart Hemming Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600

Re: beta/10

2004-12-02 Thread Henk de Bruijn
Hello Maxim, On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:19:41 +0200GMT (2-12-2004, 14:19 +0100, where I live), you wrote: Wednesday, December 01, 2004, 14:10:46, you wrote: tried that but got an AV at address 007735CD in module the bat.exe. Read of address We will fix it completely in the next beta only

Re: beta/10

2004-12-02 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Maxim, A reminder of what Maxim Masiutin on TBBETA typed on: 02 December 2004 at 16:06:44 GMT +0100 MM We will fix it completely in the next beta only :-(( You make it sound as if your going to break it again in the one after :) -- Best regards,Tony.

Re: NFS: erratic behaviour with subfilters

2004-12-02 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Boris, On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 14:05:05 +0100 GMT (18/11/2004, 20:05 +0700 GMT), Boris Anders wrote: 2) It should be possible to create a purely organizational container level (sub)filter where processing of filters further down the list occurs automatically if none of the subfilters

Minimilization

2004-12-02 Thread Tony Boom
Hello TBBETA, I know this has been asked for not too long ago but I'm going to ask again as it's bugging me now. Could we have the option to Minimise to the tray if we click the X please. I use a number of programs that have this option and it's become habit. So much so that I keep

Re: Minimilization

2004-12-02 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Tony, On 02-12-2004 16:56, you [TB] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: TB Could we have the option to Minimise to the tray if we click the X TB please. I use a number of programs that have this option and it's TB become habit. So much so that I keep closing The Bat every 5 TB minutes when

Re: Minimilization

2004-12-02 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Tony Boom everyone else, on 02-Dez-2004 at 16:56 you (Tony Boom) wrote: Could we have the option to Minimise to the tray if we click the X please. I use a number of programs that have this option and it's become habit. So much so that I keep closing The Bat every 5 minutes when what I

Beta 10 IMAP No workie

2004-12-02 Thread Matt Thoene
Hi, Beta 10 has ground my IMAP services to a halt. Some accounts work sporadically, other accounts never bring up their messages, and some just constantly give the IMAP - Server closed connection message when I know for a fact (I manage the server) the server had nothing to do with it.

Re: Minimilization

2004-12-02 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Alexander, A reminder of what Alexander S. Kunz on TBBETA typed on: 02 December 2004 at 19:05:39 GMT +0100 ASK Pretty hard to find with the title but here 'tis That's it, I knew it'd been asked for before, I vote for it too. -- Best regards,Tony.

Re: Beta 10 IMAP No workie

2004-12-02 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Matt, Thursday, December 2, 2004, 7:36:17 PM, you wrote: MT Beta 10 has ground my IMAP services to a halt. I only have one IMAP-account, but that seems to work as before... -- Best Wishes, Mark using The Bat! Version 3.0.2.10 MyMacros 1.11 Useless Macro

Re: Beta 10 IMAP No workie

2004-12-02 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Matt, On 02-12-2004 19:36, you [MT] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: MT Beta 10 has ground my IMAP services to a halt. No problem here. In order for Ritlabs to fix the problem, you really should post your IMAP settings and your IMAP server. -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter

Re: Beta 10 IMAP No workie

2004-12-02 Thread Michael Schneider
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mahlzeit Matt, Thursday, December 2, 2004 @ 7:36:17 PM: MT Beta 10 has ground my IMAP services to a halt. Some accounts work MT sporadically, other accounts never bring up their messages, and some MT just constantly give the IMAP - Server closed

Mjor TB! crash!

2004-12-02 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi all, TB! has just crashed in a way I've never seen before! I was trying to close TB! when an AV came up on my screen and was repeating itself 3-4 times a second until I task manager killed the process! If you look at the attached, it stretched to the bottom corner of my screen and when just

Re: Beta 10 IMAP No workie

2004-12-02 Thread Bobi Jam
Hello Matt, On Thursday, December 2, 2004, at 10:36:17[GMT [EMAIL PROTECTED] (which was 10:36 where I live) Matt wrote at mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Matt Beta 10 has ground my IMAP services to a halt. Some accounts work Matt sporadically, other accounts never bring up their messages, and some Matt

Re: Mjor TB! crash!

2004-12-02 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi Chris, on Thu, 2 Dec 2004 19:49:56 +GMT, you wrote: CW TB! has just crashed in a way I've never seen before! CW ... CW Has anyone else witnessed this? Not in this version. I remember occasions when this indeed happened, but that was many beta versions ago. And it was on Win98... Sorry

Re: NFS: erratic behaviour with subfilters

2004-12-02 Thread Boris Anders
Hello Thomas, Thomas Fernandez wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]): 2) It should be possible to create a purely organizational container level (sub)filter where processing of filters further down the list occurs automatically if none of the subfilters yielded an action. Yes, this is a nice

Re: Beta 10 IMAP No workie

2004-12-02 Thread AC Martin
Hi Michael Schneider, On 02/12/2004 02:22 PM, you wrote: I confirm that. 3.0.2.10 continuous loses connection to all of my four imap-accounts - one after one... ping, ping, ping, ping. Even a reconnect doesn't work - have to close TB and restart it. Confirmed here. :( -- Cheers, Allie Martin

Re: Beta 10 IMAP No workie

2004-12-02 Thread Martin Webster
AC Martin [AM], wrote: I confirm that. 3.0.2.10 continuous loses connection to all of my four imap-accounts - one after one... ping, ping, ping, ping. Even a reconnect doesn't work - have to close TB and restart it. AM Confirmed here. :( Ditto. -- .\\artin | ICQ 15893823 Example moves

Re: Beta 10 IMAP No workie

2004-12-02 Thread Tero Ripattila
Hello Allie, --On 2. joulukuuta 2004 16:50 -0500 AC Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Michael Schneider, On 02/12/2004 02:22 PM, you wrote: I confirm that. 3.0.2.10 continuous loses connection to all of my four imap-accounts - one after one... ping, ping, ping, ping. Even a reconnect doesn't

Re: Beta 10 IMAP No workie

2004-12-02 Thread Matt Thoene
On Thursday, December 2, 2004 @ 11:16:07 AM [-0700], Peter Fjelsten wrote: No problem here. In order for Ritlabs to fix the problem, you really should post your IMAP settings and your IMAP server. Yes...was just waiting for confirmation. Under IMAP Fine-Tune, I used the Fast/Permanent

Re: Mjor TB! crash!

2004-12-02 Thread Michael L. Wilson
Hello Chris, old message... Hi all, TB! has just crashed in a way I've never seen before! I was trying to close TB! when an AV came up on my screen and was repeating itself 3-4 times a second until I task manager killed the process! If you look at the attached, it stretched to the bottom

Re: Mjor TB! crash!

2004-12-02 Thread Matt Thoene
On Thursday, December 2, 2004 @ 11:49:56 AM [-0700], Chris Weaven wrote: Has anyone else witnessed this? Many times, in a few of the previous versions. Had to kill it with Task Manager. This hasn't happened to me (yet) with .10. -- Matt

Re[2]: beta/10

2004-12-02 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Stuart, Thursday, December 02, 2004, 15:22:52, you wrote: MM We will fix it completely in the next beta only :-(( Why the sad face? I don't think that anyone expected a fix without a beta release. Or did you /mean/ something else? We could have fixed in in the present beta :-) -- Best