Re: Broken Exchange download

> With the newest, I guess, 4.0.28.4, my TB is stuck when importing Exchange > emails... Please confirm. On my computer works fine, but a little bit slower. -- Pozdrowienia, Krzysztof Kudłacik Current beta is 4.0.28.4 | 'Using TBBETA'

Re: Broken Exchange download

> I have the idea that with this this version downloading messages and > removing them from the server takes a lot of time... Yes - recieving and sending messages (exchange via imap) with this beta is slower. -- Pozdrowienia, Krzysztof Kudłacik ___

Re: Broken Exchange download

On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, at 17:34:24 [GMT -0400] (which was 23:34 where I live) Vili wrote: > With the newest, I guess, 4.0.28.4, my TB is stuck when importing Exchange > emails... Please confirm. Back to 4.0.20.1 I have the idea that with this this version downloading messages and removing them fro

Re: Unread tab shows some read folders

Hello Rick, On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 17:33:32 -0400 GMT (20/08/2008, 04:33 +0700 GMT), Rick wrote: >>> Confirmations anyone? Confirmed. >> Yes. After reading your message I selected the Unread tab (which I don't >> normally use) and there they were! Two folders (one a VF) with no unread >> messages

Broken Exchange download

With the newest, I guess, 4.0.28.4, my TB is stuck when importing Exchange emails... Please confirm. Back to 4.0.20.1 -- Vili Current beta is 4.0.28.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: Unread tab shows some read folders

Title: Re: Unread tab shows some read folders > Hello Rick, >> Confirmations anyone? > Yes. After reading your message I selected the Unread tab (which I don't > normally use) and there they were! Two folders (one a VF) with no unread > messages were shown. In my case that's easy to see at fi

Re: Unread tab shows some read folders

Hello Rick, > Confirmations anyone? Yes. After reading your message I selected the Unread tab (which I don't normally use) and there they were! Two folders (one a VF) with no unread messages were shown. In my case that's easy to see at first sight because folders with no unread messages are 'y

[U&R] 4.0.28.4

am Dienstag, 19. August 2008 um 14:31 schrieb Stefan Tanurkov: > The Bat! 4.0.28.4 is available Up + Running -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Jens Franik mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Picture of me? X-Rogue http://www.de2all.de/Kr_bat.jpg The Bat! 4.0.28.4 & AntiSpamSniper 2.8.1.1 Windows 2000 5.0 build

[U&R] (was: 4.0.28.4)

[Reply to: »Stefan Tanurkov« · 2008-08-19 · 14:31 h (CET)] Moin, Stefan! > The Bat! 4.0.28.4 is available at > http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb40284.rar Up and running! Cheers! VA - -- Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end in Nirvana! Q&A

Unread tab shows some read folders

I just used the unread tab. I had 2 folders with unread messages yet there were 8 folders showing, 2 with unread and 6 with no unread messages. While this is correct I would think that the unread tab should not be showing ANY unread folders when you first select it Confirmations anyone? -- Rick T

Re: 4.0.28.3

Hi Everyone, On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:04:29 -0600, Marek Mikus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > team has developers working on core features and has coders and designers > working on GUI, so there is no reason to think, such GUI changes slows > down IMAP rework, new index file or other core feature

Re: 4.0.28.3

Hello all, Tuesday, August 19, 2008, Bob Riley wrote: > Sometimes I think we ask too much of RitLabs when The Bat! is already > a remarkable product. Let's let them focus on further development of > the IMAP capability (which is already, I think, very decent) instead > of picking at so many ti

Re: 4.0.28.4

> The Bat! 4.0.28.4 is available at > http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb40284.rar > What's new in 4.0.28.4 since 4.0.28.3: > [-] (#0007197) Wrong editor type indication when Plain text > (Windows) default editor type was selected > [*] (Beta) more cosmetic fixes on Unread Folde

Re: 4.0.28.3

> Hello Marek, >> check folder tree trash in 4.0.28.4 > Much better, don't you agree? Agreed! -- Rick Republican Tax Cuts for the wealthy Look where it has got us! v4.0.28.3 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 Current bet

Re[2]: 4.0.28.3

Hi MAU, Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 7:49:17 AM, you wrote: > Hello Mark, >> I don't even know what you guys are talking about! > The icon for Trash in the folder tree. I think the gold-colored can with the angle of view (as if it were a 3-D object) is cool. I can't believe, however, the trouble

Re: Unread tab (was:: 4.0.28.4)

Hello Dwight, On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 09:16:38 -0500 GMT (19/08/2008, 21:16 +0700 GMT), Dwight A Corrin wrote: >> However, crtl-] doesn't catch the first new message in the next folder >> when all messages are read in the previous folder, it opens the second >> or the third new message. >> Confirmat

Re: 4.0.28.4

On Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 7:31:32 AM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: > *] (Beta) more cosmetic fixes on Unread Folders Tab and positioning selection > in the Folders Tree much better. thank you. -- Dwight A. Corrin 316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax dcorrin at fastmail.fm photo galleries at http://d

thebat.net strange behavior

when first introduced last october, I created a thebat.net account. sent a few test messages, it didn't seem to work and i just forgot about it. this morning, i received all the messages created then. -- Dwight A. Corrin 316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax dcorrin at fastmail.fm photo galleries at

Re: Unread tab (was:: 4.0.28.4)

On Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 8:00:50 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > However, crtl-] doesn't catch the first new message in the next folder > when all messages are read in the previous folder, it opens the second > or the third new message. > Confirmations? Can confirm didn't go to first unread m

Re: Trash icon (was: 4.0.28.3)

Hello MAU, On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:50:50 +0200 GMT (19/08/2008, 20:50 +0700 GMT), MAU wrote: >> I cannot believe we are discussing trash folder glyphs! M> Why not? It's a far more important issue than folders jumping around in M> the Unread tab. ;-) Thought so. Agreed, let's work on the importan

Re: Trash icon (was: 4.0.28.3)

Hello Thomas, > I cannot believe we are discussing trash folder glyphs! Why not? It's a far more important issue than folders jumping around in the Unread tab. ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.0.28.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3 _

Re: 4.0.28.3

Hello all, Tuesday, August 19, 2008, MAU wrote: >> check folder tree trash in 4.0.28.4 > Much better, don't you agree? yes, i agree, i like it now. Only remote trash is needed yet. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 4.0.28.4 under Windo

Re: 4.0.28.3

Hello Mark, > I don't even know what you guys are talking about! The icon for Trash in the folder tree. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.0.28.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3 Current beta is

Re: 4.0.28.3

Hello Marek, > check folder tree trash in 4.0.28.4 Much better, don't you agree? -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v4.0.28.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 3 Current beta is 4.0.28.4 | 'Using TBBET

Trash icon (was: 4.0.28.3)

Hello MAU, On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 10:50:57 +0200 GMT (19/08/2008, 15:50 +0700 GMT), MAU wrote: [*] glyphs for trash in folder tree replaced >> >>> Ugly! Why not use the one used for 'Delete' in message menus? >> >> delete one message and You will see garbage in trash :-) M> Yes, I've seen it.

Re: 4.0.28.4

Hi Stefan, On Tue, 19 Aug 2008, at 15:31:32 [GMT +0300] (which was 14:31 where I live) you wrote about: '4.0.28.4' > [*] (Beta) more cosmetic fixes on Unread Folders Tab and > positioning selection in the Folders Tree Yes, it is definitely better now. AFAICS it works just like the unread tab of

Unread tab (was:: 4.0.28.4)

Hello Stefan, On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:31:32 +0300 GMT (19/08/2008, 19:31 +0700 GMT), Stefan Tanurkov wrote: ST> The Bat! 4.0.28.4 is available at ST> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb40284.rar ST> [*] (Beta) more cosmetic fixes on Unread Folders Tab and ST> positioning select

Re: 4.0.28.3

Hello MAU, Tuesday, August 19, 2008, 12:51:42 AM, you wrote: >> [*] glyphs for trash in folder tree replaced M> Ugly! Why not use the one used for 'Delete' in message menus? I don't even know what you guys are talking about! :-) -- Best Wishes, Mark using The B

Re: 4.0.28.4

Hello all, Tuesday, August 19, 2008, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: > The Bat! 4.0.28.4 is available at > http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb40284.rar > What's new in 4.0.28.4 since 4.0.28.3: > [-] (#0007197) Wrong editor type indication when Plain text (Windows) default > editor type

Re: 4.0.28.3

Hello all, Tuesday, August 19, 2008, MAU wrote: > Yes, I've seen it. But that's not new, previous version(s) did the same. > Anyway, I think it's ugly. If you saw the icon just by itself, not in > the folder tree and with the word 'Trash' next to it, would you > undoubtedly recognise it as a tr

4.0.28.4

The Bat! 4.0.28.4 is available at http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/the_bat/beta/tb40284.rar What's new in 4.0.28.4 since 4.0.28.3: [-] (#0007197) Wrong editor type indication when Plain text (Windows) default editor type was selected [*] (Beta) more cosmetic fixes on Unread Folders Tab and

Re: 4.0.28.3

> The Bat! 4.0.28.3 is available at So far it works fine under Exchange (via IMAP). -- Pozdrowienia, Krzysztof Kudłacik Current beta is 4.0.28.3 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: 4.0.28.3

Hello Marek, >>> [*] glyphs for trash in folder tree replaced > >> Ugly! Why not use the one used for 'Delete' in message menus? > > delete one message and You will see garbage in trash :-) Yes, I've seen it. But that's not new, previous version(s) did the same. Anyway, I think it's ugly. If you

Re: Priority of common rules ?

MAU schrieb: > Hello Albrecht, > >> I find out that the rule in the accounts goes before common >> rules ? IMHO that isn't correct. Isn't it right that common rules should >> always go before account rules ? > > Are you sure your Common filter(s) is/are shared with the proper > account(s)? >