Re: Postponed Sending dialogue

2009-04-28 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »Maxim Masiutin« · 2009-04-28 · 11:40 h (CET)] Moin, Maxim! > The problem is in this case the user will have to click the GUI for > each for the message sent, like in Outlook. We want to give an > option to to configure the postponed sending autmatically for every > message, so the use

Re: [SOT] How can I disable star (*) from acting on folder pane?

2009-04-28 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 23:24:43, NetVicious wrote: > I think all tree controls interpret it in this way. Actually, it behaves differently in The Bat than in other treeviews - in The Bat, * will expand all branches, while in other treeviews it'll only expand current branch from selected tree

Re: [SOT] How can I disable star (*) from acting on folder pane?

2009-04-28 Thread MAU
Hello NetVicious, >> Does anybody know of any way that could prevent this from happening? >> Like disabling (*) from acting on folder pane? I've been looking at >> Customiser and found no way. > > I think the * shortcut key it's a default option in windows for years, > I used it on Windows 3.0

Re: [SOT] How can I disable star (*) from acting on folder pane?

2009-04-28 Thread NetVicious
martes, 28 abr 2009 at 18:01, it seems you wrote: > Does anybody know of any way that could prevent this from happening? > Like disabling (*) from acting on folder pane? I've been looking at > Customiser and found no way. I think the * shortcut key it's a default option in windows for years, I

Re: Hold Over

2009-04-28 Thread Paul Meathrel
Hi Maxim, Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 9:47:49 AM, you wrote: > Dictionaries give "hold over" as a sinonym for "postpone" or > "delay", with the following examples: Hold over is not something that a native English speaker would say in this context. -- Warmest regards, Paul Created using TheBat! 4

[SOT] How can I disable star (*) from acting on folder pane?

2009-04-28 Thread MAU
Hello all, Sorry, I know it is not a beta issue but I assume there is more people watching this list than TBUDL. Quite frequently I use the star (*) hot key to expand all threads in the Message List, but every now and then I hit it while focus is on the folder pane and then all my accounts and f

Re: Postponed Sending dialogue

2009-04-28 Thread Roger Phillips
Hello Maxim, Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 11:21:02 AM, among other things, you wrote: MM> Hello Roger, MM> Monday, April 27, 2009, 7:40:48, you wrote: >>>It is not clear to me just what is the need for "Test against an arbitrary >>>date and time in the future". MM> This can be useful, for exa

Re: Postponed Sending dialogue

2009-04-28 Thread Jens Franik
Dienstag, 28. April 2009 at 11:31, Maxim Masiutin wrote: >>>I would suggest to remove most of the "More" part at the bottom of the >>>dialog. => See attachments. That is enough (until i understand why to have more than that): http://www.de2all.de/thebat/screen78.png -- With kind Regards Jens

Re: Postponed Sending dialogue

2009-04-28 Thread Jens Franik
Dienstag, 28. April 2009 at 11:31, Maxim Masiutin wrote: >>>Yes, exept of the lower part with the "compare against date.." > How do you suggest to improve it? I read you explanation in but i have to read it all again, because i am confused with postponed and delay. I would either: - add year

Re: 4.1.11.18 Postponed Time Warp

2009-04-28 Thread Jens Franik
Dienstag, 28. April 2009 at 11:27, Maxim Masiutin wrote: >>>| IF a message will be postponed on Mittwoch, 29. April 2009 13:18, it >>>| will be sent on Dienstag, 28. April 2009 13:18. > If you mean that the dates are formatting using the language > configured Windows regional/language settings,

Re: Postponed Sending dialogue

2009-04-28 Thread Jens Franik
Dienstag, 28. April 2009 at 11:20, Volker Ahrendt wrote: > Either you want to send a message in x days/hours/minutes or at a > specific time. But please do not mix it up and confuse the user. > > Instead of the mentioned above, one can say: "Send message April 30, > 8:00 h." – Where is the proble

Re: Attachments - Paper Clip

2009-04-28 Thread Jens Franik
Dienstag, 28. April 2009 at 01:31, Marek Mikus wrote: >> I do not see any visible difference right now :-) > second message has one attach only, first has two attachments. Ah, you are right. Well, they already know it, so it is only a matter of time when it will be fixed... :-) -- With kind R

Re: Postponed Sending dialogue

2009-04-28 Thread MAU
Hello Maxim, >>>So, my suggestion would be to make the title be 'Postponed/Scheduled >>>Sending'. > > This is a nice idea. At least The Bat! uses it's scheduler and creates > events to send the messages. Well, with this one, it is 3 beers in total that you owe me ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A.

Re: Hold Over

2009-04-28 Thread MAU
Hello Maxim, >>>Now, for the first part. 'Hold Over' is not clear and is not correct >>>English. It should be either 'Hold for' or 'Send in'. That is, 'Hold >>>for 2 hrs' or 'Send in 2 hrs'. > > Dictionaries give "hold over" as a sinonym for "postpone" or "delay", > with the following examples: >

Re: Postponed Sending dialogue

2009-04-28 Thread MAU
Hello Volker, >> But it gives another complication. The user can combine "hold over >> (2) days" and "use specific time 8:00" for, example, which means >> that the message will be send in 8:00 in two days after today. > > This may be a nice try, but please keep it simple: > > Either you want to se

Re: Postponed Sending dialogue

2009-04-28 Thread MAU
Hello Maxim, >>>Hold for... >>>( ) Hours ( ) Minutes ( ) Seconds >>>... and then send. > > Your idea to use the tail "...and then send" is excellent! Thank you :( > But it gives another complication. The user can combine "hold over > (2) days" and "use specific time 8:00" for, example, which m

Re: Attachments - Paper Clip

2009-04-28 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 3:33:51 AM, Volker Ahrendt wrote: > If one disregards the part.txt, you may be right. ;-) > This is the first time, that I can reproduce this problem. So actually > it seems to be linked to the file extension of the attachments. In my > work environment it is as follow

Re: Postponed Sending dialogue

2009-04-28 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »Maxim Masiutin« · 2009-04-28 · 11:31 h (CET)] Moin, Maxim! >>>I would suggest to remove most of the "More" part at the bottom of the >>>dialog. => See attachments. > Why do you suggest to remove it? Okay, leave the info, that the postponed message will be sent on … But the test sec

Re: Postponed Sending dialogue

2009-04-28 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »Maxim Masiutin« · 2009-04-28 · 11:31 h (CET)] Moin, Maxim! >>>I would suggest to remove most of the "More" part at the bottom of the >>>dialog. => See attachments. > Why do you suggest to remove it? Okay, leave the info, that the postponed message will be sent on … But the test sec

Re[2]: Postponed Sending dialogue

2009-04-28 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Volker, Tuesday, April 28, 2009, 12:20:14, you wrote: >>Either you want to send a message in x days/hours/minutes or at a >>specific time. But please do not mix it up and confuse the user. No, the idea is to combine both of the options. >>Instead of the mentioned above, one can say: "Send

Re[2]: Postponed Sending dialogue

2009-04-28 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Volker, Monday, April 27, 2009, 23:36:02, you wrote: >>I would suggest to remove most of the "More" part at the bottom of the >>dialog. => See attachments. Why do you suggest to remove it? -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutin Ritlabs SRL http://www.ritlabs.com/ _

Re[2]: Postponed Sending dialogue

2009-04-28 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Jens, Monday, April 27, 2009, 22:52:00, you wrote: >>Yes, exept of the lower part with the "compare against date.." How do you suggest to improve it? -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutin Ritlabs SRL http://www.ritlabs.com/

Re[2]: 4.1.11.18 Postponed Time Warp

2009-04-28 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Jens, Monday, April 27, 2009, 13:25:07, you wrote: >>| IF a message will be postponed on Mittwoch, 29. April 2009 13:18, it >>| will be sent on Dienstag, 28. April 2009 13:18. If you mean that the dates are formatting using the language configured Windows regional/language settings, rathe

Re[2]: Postponed Sending dialogue

2009-04-28 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Roger, Monday, April 27, 2009, 7:40:48, you wrote: >>It is not clear to me just what is the need for "Test against an arbitrary >>date and time in the future". This can be useful, for example, for messages that are automatically created by sorting office filters or by mass mailing qu

Re: Postponed Sending dialogue

2009-04-28 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »Maxim Masiutin« · 2009-04-28 · 10:54 h (CET)] Moin, Maxim! >>>Hold for... >>>( ) Hours ( ) Minutes ( ) Seconds >>>... and then send. > Your idea to use the tail "...and then send" is excellent! +1 > But it gives another complication. The user can combine "hold over > (2) days" and

Re[2]: Postponed Sending dialogue

2009-04-28 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Mau, Monday, April 27, 2009, 2:03:40, you wrote: >>So, my suggestion would be to make the >>title be 'Postponed/Scheduled Sending'. This is a nice idea. At least The Bat! uses it's scheduler and creates events to send the messages. -- Best regards, Maxim Masiutin

Re[2]: Postponed Sending dialogue

2009-04-28 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Mau, Monday, April 27, 2009, 2:03:40, you wrote: >>Hold for... >>( ) Hours ( ) Minutes ( ) Seconds >>... and then send. Your idea to use the tail "...and then send" is excellent! But it gives another complication. The user can combine "hold over (2) days" and "use specific time 8:00" f

Hold Over

2009-04-28 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Mau, Monday, April 27, 2009, 2:03:40, you wrote: >>Now, for the first part. 'Hold Over' is not clear and is not correct >>English. It should be either 'Hold for' or 'Send in'. That is, 'Hold for >>2 hrs' or 'Send in 2 hrs'. Dictionaries give "hold over" as a sinonym for "postpone" or "dela

Re: Attachments - Paper Clip

2009-04-28 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »Marek Mikus« · 2009-04-28 · 01:31 h (CET)] Moin, Marek! >> very funny, the first Message of Volker >> mid:1984340334.20090427223...@ahrendt.net does not show a Paper >> Clip Icon for the Attachments, >> but the second one mid:1348910022.20090427230...@ahrendt.net shows >> a Paper Cli