Re: 5.0.14

2011-06-20 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Marek, Tuesday, June 21, 2011, 1:00:37 AM, you wrote: > why it was released, if it is not OK?? Why are You asking us then? why we > translated it if You released old intpack? :-( 5.0.12 has very serious bugs and we could not wait any longer, we needed to issue a fixed version, albeit wi

Re: 5.0.14

2011-06-20 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Saturday, June 18, 2011, Maxim Masiutin wrote: > Hello Tbbeta, > Please test those MSIs, if they will be OK, we will release them on Monday. why it was released, if it is not OK?? Why are You asking us then? why we translated it if You released old intpack? :-( -- Bye Marek Mikus

Re: 5.0.14

2011-06-20 Thread Rick
> I started getting duplicate messages in the message list with this > version, where the duplicates don't really behave like normal messages > (clicking them does nothing, and they can't be marked as read; they > disappear when I move to another folder and go back). I can confirm this behavior

Re: 5.0.14

2011-06-20 Thread Marck Pearlstone
Dear Jernej, @20-Jun-2011, 21:04 +0200 (20-Jun 20:04 here) Jernej Simončič [JS] in mid:1435541021.20110620210...@eternallybored.org said to Maxim: >> Please test those MSIs, if they will be OK, we will release them on Monday. JS> I started getting duplicate messages in the message list with this

Re: 5.0.14

2011-06-20 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Saturday, June 18, 2011, 7:25:56, Maxim Masiutin wrote: > Please test those MSIs, if they will be OK, we will release them on Monday. I started getting duplicate messages in the message list with this version, where the duplicates don't really behave like normal messages (clicking them does no

Re: Big memory usage in 5.0.14

2011-06-20 Thread mse
Hello Marek, MM> Hello, MM> I observe strange lagging in interface, mainly in Microed when writing, now MM> have I checked taskmanager and TB used 365M minute ago and now decreased to MM> 165M. MM> As I can say, this lagging happened in 5.0.12.16 already. I cannot confirm the behavior you descri