Hello Alexander!
On Monday, July 18, 2005, 11:07 AM, you wrote:
I got overstressed about the 4904 bug.
>>> Don't get it now. Why do you call it 4904?
>> From the BT issue report number:
>> http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4904
> Haha, thats funny... I can see future conversations here
Hello Mary Bull & everyone else,
on 18-Jul-2005 at 15:37 you (Mary Bull) wrote:
>>> I got overstressed about the 4904 bug.
>> Don't get it now. Why do you call it 4904?
> From the BT issue report number:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4904
Haha, thats funny... I can see future convers
Hello Manuel!
On Monday, July 18, 2005, 8:05 AM, you wrote:
>> I got overstressed about the 4904 bug.
> Don't get it now. Why do you call it 4904?
From the BT issue report number:
http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4904
>> I never think well when I'm overstressed! Ah, well, but here I am
>>
On Monday, 18 Juli 2005 at 14:53, Mary Bull wrote:
> >> With my nose within 2 inches of the screen, I see 2.55 GHz.
> >
> > LOL, that indeed made me laugh. Not your "faulty" writing of your
> > computer's power...
>
> Resolution is everything! :unreal2:
Over here: 1680x1050 on a 17" - nice. ;-)
Hello Manuel!
On Monday, July 18, 2005, 7:40 AM, you wrote:
>> > ...has to be 2.55 GHz, I think. :D
>> With my nose within 2 inches of the screen, I see 2.55 GHz.
> LOL, that indeed made me laugh. Not your "faulty" writing of your
> computer's power...
Resolution is everything! :unreal2:
>> T
On Monday, 18 July 2005 at 13:53, Mary Bull wrote:
> > ...has to be 2.55 GHz, I think. :D
> With my nose within 2 inches of the screen, I see 2.55 GHz.
LOL, that indeed made me laugh. Not your "faulty" writing of your computer's
power...
> This was not the 4904 character-dropping bug. And I di
Hello Manuel!
On Monday, July 18, 2005, 6:38 AM, you wrote:
>> I've double-checked: it's what it says. TB! did, however, swallow a
>> space: 255 GHz. I think the space will stay in, this time, since I've
>> reverted temporarily to using v. 3.0.2.10.
> I'll pay some thousand dollars and will arri
On Monday, 18 July 2005 at 13:28 Mary Bull wrote:
> I've double-checked: it's what it says. TB! did, however, swallow a
> space: 255 GHz. I think the space will stay in, this time, since I've
> reverted temporarily to using v. 3.0.2.10.
I'll pay some thousand dollars and will arrive by airplane t
Hello Alexander!
On Monday, July 18, 2005, 5:37 AM, you wrote:
>> 255GHz
> Unless TB has swallowed a dot somewhere, you have the fastest single CPU
> computer on Earth, wow! ;-)
Well, that's what Windows said in My Computer/Properties/General.
I've double-checked: it's what it says. TB! did, h
Hello Mary Bull & everyone else,
on 18-Jul-2005 at 01:00 you (Mary Bull) wrote:
> 255GHz
Unless TB has swallowed a dot somewhere, you have the fastest single CPU
computer on Earth, wow! ;-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
___
Hello Natasha!
On Sunday, July 17, 2005, 5:26 PM, you wrote:
>> The Bug Report page (4904) asks for Feedback, but I don't know what
>> is wanted in the way of Feedback there. :woe:
> http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4904
> What they seem to be looking for - this from a conversation with
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
