Hello Dimitry,
DA Could you tell if the Sender header field should also match on a
DA X-Sender header?
Yes
-
9Val
Current beta is 3.0.2.1 Beta/1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hello Bill,
BM This problem was fixed in an early beta. Worked fine in 17,
BM now fails again in 18.
Hmm, looks like somebody reverted file to previous revision :(
Re-fixed
--
9Val
On 2004-09-25 at 00:23:11 9Val wrote:
Hmm, looks like somebody reverted file to previous revision :(
Re-fixed
Could you tell if the Sender header field should also match on a
X-Sender header? This is what I've been seeing most of the time, so
I needed to revert to the pre-NFS way of
On Fri 24-Sep-04 2:25pm -0400, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2004-09-24 at 21:03:50 Bill McCarthy wrote:
(1) That's not the sender field. The sender field for all
messages here is:
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(2) Perhaps I wasn't clear enough. I was talking about the
NFS filter condition
On Fri 24-Sep-04 5:23pm -0400, 9Val wrote:
BM This problem was fixed in an early beta. Worked fine in 17,
BM now fails again in 18.
Hmm, looks like somebody reverted file to previous revision :(
Re-fixed
Great, looking forward to 19 :-)
BTW, my work-a-round is also failing. I had:
5 matches
Mail list logo
