Roelof,
Thursday, February 7, 2013, 10:49:30 AM, you wrote:
RO Hallo Steven,
RO On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 07:59:19 -0500GMT (7-2-2013, 13:59 , where I
RO live), you wrote:
SPV What happens first: Filtering or Junk Checking?
RO Junk checking happens first. Cannot be altered.
Thanks, that's what I
Friday, February 8, 2013, 8:13:46 AM, I wrote:
SPV Today it was all of the new messages from this group (TBBETA)
SPV that landed in the Junk mail folder. Even the one I posted.
SPV Something is definitely wrong. TBBETA messages have been
SPV filtered correctly for *YEARS* with virtually zero
I've been noticing that message from one particular sender
are often sent to the junk folder instead of going where
the filter that matches both the subject and the sender
(though the filter is set to the OR of either one.) This
doesn't ALWAYS happen, but it has been happening often
enough that
Hallo Steven,
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013 07:59:19 -0500GMT (7-2-2013, 13:59 , where I
live), you wrote:
SPV What happens first: Filtering or Junk Checking?
Junk checking happens first. Cannot be altered.
However, what you can do, is make your spam filter add a header (or
add something to the
Hello,
I hope that someone can confirm this or tell me if it has been
fixed. I'm currently using 4.2.24.5 and set an outgoing filter to
forward a message of all outgoing emails from a specific account to
my boss (he wants to see everything - don't ask).
My problem comes from TB
Hello Zygmunt,
Thank you for the response. Actually, I was able to create a work
around by simply setting the filter from Any Message to Recipient
does not equal and my boss's email address. (besides, if I send him
an email to begin with, I don't need another copy of it going to him)
I would
Hello all ,
I have a filter that I activate manually. It has worked for at least 2 years on
the currently highlighted message. In this version it not only acts on the
message that is highlighted, but on the one above it as well. (As if you held
the combination of keys too long)
This
Hallo Peter,
On Mon, 12 Jun 2006 20:56:37 +0200GMT (12-6-2006, 20:56 , where I
live), you wrote:
PF Am I the only one who thinks it is less than intelligent that common
PF filters move messages while they're in the outbox being composed?
I guess not, but from the lack of replies I deduce that
Roelof,
On 13-06-2006 18:09, you wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I guess not, but from the lack of replies I deduce that it isn't a
very common problem.
Yes. Apparently nobody is using client side common filters on IMAP
accounts.
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten
Hello beta testers.
Am I the only one who thinks it is less than intelligent that common
filters move messages while they're in the outbox being composed?
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten /author
thebat version 3.80.06 Pro /thebat versionextras MyGate, AVG /extras
Hello TB Beta List,
I have a filter that is triggered by empty subject - it does
nothing but does not continue processing (leaving the mail
in the inbox).
The filter is:
Header field Subject match ^\s*$
I have two emails in my inbox that triggered this filter (I
checked these emails with
Hæ!
Today, I stumbled on a filter which normally only was set up as an
incoming filter, but which also appeared in the Kill filter section as
an Ignore filter. Deleting this one gave me AVs and I had to manually
kill TB via Task Manager.
After restarting TB, both filters were not present
Hi, Oliver.
Olivier Mascia wrote:
Is there some central wish-list about TB IMAP features somewhere ? I'd
like to read it and probably add some input.
Peter recently started a thread on this topic at:
msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[snip]
I found your discussion of POP3/IMAP clients highly interesting
I filter my Inbox for a particular email adress, assign a color group and
finally move these messages to another folder. When I use this filter
with IMAP provider1 the filter always fails. The result is that
these messages stay in the Inbox and don't have the appropriate color.
When I invoke the
mml,
On 19-09-2004 14:02, you [mmd] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
mmd I filter my Inbox for a particular email adress, assign a color group and
mmd finally move these messages to another folder.
Each time I assign a colour group to an IMAP message, that colour group
is lost on moving the
Mml, [M] wrote:
I filter my Inbox for a particular email adress, assign a color group and
finally move these messages to another folder. When I use this filter
with IMAP provider1 the filter always fails. The result is that
these messages stay in the Inbox and don't have the appropriate
Peter Fjelsten, [PF] wrote:
Each time I assign a colour group to an IMAP message, that colour
group is lost on moving the message.
This isn't surprising since moving the message moves the message to
another IMAP folder on the server. TB! sync's with this IMAP folder
which holds no information
On Friday 8 September 2000 Januk Aggarwal wrote:
A quick question, do you filter all these subscriptions to individual
folders? If you do, have you considered using folder level
templates?
Yes and no. I filter to different folders based on the subject of the
list, but many lists usually
18 matches
Mail list logo
