Hello Thomas,
Did I understand you right: Your filters match on is in addressbook,
and adding addresses to the AB is fairly fast?
Yes, that's right. I use Address groups contain...
If so, I will try that workaround for the one or two major filters. I
don't think I will create 73 AB groups
Hello MAU,
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 13:35:07 +0200 GMT (30/10/2004, 18:35 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
don't think I will create 73 AB groups and redo all my filters...
M You can temporarily add a Capture address action to your filters to
M automatically build up your AB Groups.
Thanks, I will try that.
Hello Thomas,
M I haven't tested this yet. I will let you know if I do.
Please do. I consider your suggestion a viable work-around, but I
would like to use the filters straight forward, as I used to.
OK, I've created a new filter with some 80 OR conditions and yes, it
takes some 6-7 seconds
Hello MAU,
On Sat, 30 Oct 2004 20:05:13 +0200 GMT (31/10/2004, 01:05 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
M OK, I've created a new filter with some 80 OR conditions and yes, it
M takes some 6-7 seconds to open. However, adding a new condition is
M immediate in my case.
Thanks for your test. You are not
This is a forwarded message
From: Thomas Fernandez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, October 29, 2004, 10:58:41 PM
Subject: NFS: Slow opening and adding filter conditions
===8==Original message text===
Hello TBBETA,
I didn't get a reply on TBUDL, so
Hello Thomas,
snipped quite a bit
NB: I know my number of filters and conditions is unusually high, but
shouldn't TB v3 be able to handle it as gracefully as v2.12 did? At
least you get a clue why I said in the beta phase that filtering is
crucial to me, I couldn't handle over 300 messages
Hello MAU,
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 19:02:17 +0200 GMT (30/10/2004, 00:02 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
M I must admit it looks like quite a slow process. Anyway, as a workaround
M if you are filtering on umpteen email addresses with umpteen OR
M conditions (as you seem to say),
Correct.
M I would suggest
7 matches
Mail list logo
