Hello Allie,
Saturday, June 4, 2005, 12:44:28 AM, you wrote:
I'm testing the service now and it's darned good. What it supports
in addition to what you mentioned is server side threading.
It's difficult to summarise FM's services in just two lines :)
I've used them for two years now,
On Friday, June 3, 2005 @ 4:44:28 PM [-0700], Allie Martin wrote:
I host my main domain with FM and have just set up this address for my
mailing lists - changing from MailSnare. It's a good service with good
support and a fast web interface, too. Never any threading problems with TB
either!
--On 4 June 2005 00:10 -0700 Matt Thoene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have any of you noticed an improvement with TB and IMAP with FastMail?
I've been collecting mail from two different IMAP servers for the past
year, including FastMail, using TB and Mulberry and the results have been
Hello Allie.
--On 03 June 2005 18:44 -0500 you wrote about Re: IMAP: Messages not
expunged:
A most tempting solution for my mail in general.
And labels :)
--
Tony.
M
pgp1UEM0IxVU4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Current beta
Hello Clive.
--On 04 June 2005 07:13 +0100 you wrote about Re: IMAP: Messages not
expunged:
They've been pretty reliable as other posters here who use their
service can testify.
Using 11 IMAP server it used to take me over 30 minutes at first boot to
get to read my first message. Each
Hello Matt.
--On 04 June 2005 00:10 -0700 you wrote about Re: IMAP: Messages not
expunged:
Have any of you noticed an improvement with TB and IMAP with FastMail?
To be honest I'm nervous of trying it. FM has been such a performance
revaluation for me, I'm not sure I could take
Since changing to FM it's every bit as fast as POP or reading mail
from local folders. Whole message lists appear in fractions of a second
and full bodies display twice as quick as that
All true
All that speed and function for the same cost per year as one 50g packet
of tobacco or 3 and a
Hi Tony,
On 4/6/2005 12:17 PM +0100, you wrote:
To be honest I'm nervous of trying it. FM has been such a performance
revaluation for me, I'm not sure I could take the disappointment if TB
doesn't fully exploit the advantages a decent mature IMAP server like
FM has given me over my old,
To be honest I'm nervous of trying it
Try it, Tony. While TB is still slower than other mailers (cough!) it's
usable for me - but still frustrating. I'm on a 2Mb connection as you are
but that's no help when TB gets the hump.
--
Clive Taylor
Hello Clive.
--On 04 June 2005 12:35 +0100 you wrote about Re: IMAP: Messages not
expunged:
Not as far as I know but if you're defining actions in FastMail then
FastMail will control them.
Yes, that's what I think I'll read up on next. I'm still waiting for yahoo
to change my address
Hello Allie.
--On 04 June 2005 06:37 -0500 you wrote about Re: IMAP: Messages not
expunged:
There are still hiccups with deleting messages. I have to do a manual
purge and compress at times.
Oh dear, I think I'll wait a little longer then. Thanks for sparing me the
heartache.
--
Tony.
M
Hello Clive.
--On 04 June 2005 12:38 +0100 you wrote about Re: IMAP: Messages not
expunged:
I'm on a 2Mb connection as you are but that's no help when TB gets the
hump.
Hell hath no fury like a women or The Bat! scorned :)
At least with a women you can just walk out and go up the Pub
Saturday, June 4, 2005, 2:10:11 AM, (Internet Time - @340) you wrote:
Hello Matt,
MT Have any of you noticed an improvement with TB and IMAP with FastMail?
I have recently, last night, reset up IMAP Account and am trying it
out now. As far as I can tell it is working pretty good. Much better
Hi,
One of my IMAP accounts uses iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17
as the server.
I'm also not getting messages expunged after deleting and using the
compress command. The messages remain in the account until I expunge
using Mulberry.
I'll have to put together some logs for this when it
Hello Allie.
--On 03 June 2005 12:31 -0500 you wrote about IMAP: Messages not expunged:
I'm also not getting messages expunged after deleting and using the
compress command. The messages remain in the account until I expunge
using Mulberry.
I am so glad about that... Not glad your having
Hello Tony,
Friday, June 3, 2005, 6:47:49 PM, you wrote:
glad it's NOT just me. I was beginning to think they thought I was
telling porkies
Happens here, too. Mulberry or IMAPSize are my friends then.
--
Regards,
Clive Taylor
TheBat!:3.5.25
Windows XP: Service Pack 2
Hello Clive.
--On 03 June 2005 20:48 +0100 you wrote about Re: IMAP: Messages not
expunged:
Happens here, too. Mulberry or IMAPSize are my friends then.
How's my threading by the way?
--
Tony.
M
pgpxJ3Z1XsSUs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Tony,
-- 03.06.2005 20:52 +0100:
Happens here, too. Mulberry or IMAPSize are my friends then.
How's my threading by the way?
As predicted in private,... you're the man, it works! ;)
--
Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de
Hi Manuel,
On 03/06/2005 10:00 PM +0200, you wrote:
As predicted in private,... you're the man, it works! ;)
He can now continue his IMAP campaign with threaded comfort.. ;)
--
Allie Martin
System specs: http://www.ac-martin.com/sysspecs.htm
-=-=-
If you find yourself in a hole, the
Hi Allie,
-- 03.06.2005 15:07 -0500:
As predicted in private,... you're the man, it works! ;)
He can now continue his IMAP campaign with threaded comfort.. ;)
Hehe, I think he will. ;)
Another feature wish from my side: Please support labels!
--
Manuel, http://www.manuel-breitfeld.de
--On 3 June 2005 20:52 +0100 Tony Boom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How's my threading by the way?
All right here, luv. See you've swapped to FM. Free trial or paid a/c?
--
Clive Taylor
Current beta is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBBETA'
Hello Manuel.
--On 03 June 2005 22:00 +0200 you wrote about Re: IMAP: Messages not
expunged:
As predicted in private,... you're the man, it works! ;)
And such a small price to pay for perfection :)
--
Tony.
M
pgpXEZOqZbznW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello Allie.
--On 03 June 2005 15:07 -0500 you wrote about Re: IMAP: Messages not
expunged:
He can now continue his IMAP campaign with threaded comfort.. ;)
And all thanks to a super fast, *Label supporting*, fully fredding, IMAP
server that works :)
--
Tony.
M
pgpj29idQh1a0.pgp
Hello Clive.
--On 03 June 2005 21:29 +0100 you wrote about Re: IMAP: Messages not
expunged:
All right here, luv. See you've swapped to FM. Free trial or paid a/c?
Full account, less than 11 quid a year and worth every penny if only for
the *label support*.
--
Tony.
M
pgpu1puaAUo5k.pgp
--On 3 June 2005 21:35 +0100 Tony Boom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Full account, less than 11 quid a year and worth every penny if only for
the *label support*.
I host my main domain with FM and have just set up this address for my
mailing lists - changing from MailSnare. It's a good service
On Friday, June 03, 2005 at 3:40:46 PM [GMT -0500], Clive Taylor wrote:
I host my main domain with FM and have just set up this address for my
mailing lists - changing from MailSnare. It's a good service with good
support and a fast web interface, too. Never any threading problems with TB
26 matches
Mail list logo
