Hi Vili,
V Just FYI, I sent 9Val this (I am too working with him on it :))):
Sounds good - although I didn't understand much of what he has written
to you... :-)
V :)) I wrote that to him... :) It was about problem related to creation
V of the 1st mail in the Outbox. :)
:P We found reason
Hello 9Val,
V Just FYI, I sent 9Val this (I am too working with him on it :))):
Sounds good - although I didn't understand much of what he has written
to you... :-)
V :)) I wrote that to him... :) It was about problem related to creation
V of the 1st mail in the Outbox. :)
:P We found reason
Hi Vili,
V It just happens with the 1st mail. If you create 2 draft mails, the
V 1st has problem, the 2nd not...
V Unfortunately can't reproduce
V So now you find the reason with Peter or not? I mean It was about
V problem related to creation of the 1st mail in the Outbox. :) in the
V
Hello 9Val,
V It just happens with the 1st mail. If you create 2 draft mails, the
V 1st has problem, the 2nd not...
V Unfortunately can't reproduce
V So now you find the reason with Peter or not? I mean It was about
V problem related to creation of the 1st mail in the Outbox. :) in the
V
Hi Allie Martin,
On Saturday, July 02, 2005, you wrote:
I've been playing some serious catch up. Work is being incredibly
evil, so I'm having issues keeping up at the moment
I've been using TB! IMAP quite comfortably.
As have I more recently.
However, I'm now having an Inbox problem that
Hi Jonathan,
On 12/07/2005 09:27 AM -0500, you wrote:
See, this is where I get confused. On my settings, I have don't
synchronize on all, and I don't have it set to peek inside certain
folders for mail counts, and yet it still goes inside every folder to
see the contents. I'm guessing that
Jonathan,
On 12-07-2005 16:27, you [JA] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- I don't use a server side Outbox. It's just troublesome and often
leads to multiple messages being sent and multiple messages being in
the outbox when using the intermittent save option while composing.
JA I've not used
Hello Peter,
On 12-07-2005 16:27, you [JA] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- I don't use a server side Outbox. It's just troublesome and often
leads to multiple messages being sent and multiple messages being in
the outbox when using the intermittent save option while composing.
JA I've not
Vili,
On 12-07-2005 22:50, you [V] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
V Just FYI, I sent 9Val this (I am too working with him on it :))):
Sounds good - although I didn't understand much of what he has written
to you... :-)
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten /author
thebat
Hello Peter,
V Just FYI, I sent 9Val this (I am too working with him on it :))):
Sounds good - although I didn't understand much of what he has written
to you... :-)
:)) I wrote that to him... :) It was about problem related to creation
of the 1st mail in the Outbox. :)
--
Vili
Hello Allie,
TB!'s parking and flagging are not standard.
It is wrong suggestion - TB! uses standard flags both for flagging and
parking.
I haven't tried to do this, but I think when you delete the HTML
component, you're deleting the HTML component from the cached copy of
the message and
Hi 9Val,
On 05/07/2005 04:19 PM +0300, you wrote:
TB!'s parking and flagging are not standard.
It is wrong suggestion - TB! uses standard flags both for flagging and
parking.
Which one does it use for parking?
I see that the standard 'flag' for marking a message as 'important' is
what
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On 3 July 2005 11:02:20 -0500 Allie Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, you'll
not be able to appreciate the flags when using other clients like
ThunderBird or Mulberry.
As far as I remember if you park a message in TB it will show
On Monday, July 04, 2005 at 4:06:25 AM [GMT -0500], Tony Boom wrote:
As far as I remember if you park a message in TB it will show flagged as
important in Mulberry and vice versa, as far as I remember that is.
I just tried it. Parking doesn't show up in Mulberry.
However, flagging in TB!
Hello Allie,
Saturday, July 2, 2005, 11:22:03 PM, you wrote:
I must say I'd sure rather make my filters in TB! than the clunky HTML
interface at fastmail.
FastMail supports Seive scripting. It's a special filtering script.
Instead of using the filter creation interface, you can create your
On Sunday, July 03, 2005 at 8:41:34 AM [GMT -0500], Dwight A Corrin
wrote:
Maybe there is some way I'm missing to do a few other server side
message management functions?
Nope. A lot of what you can do to messages in TB! are just POP stuff
which may be done only to the local cache copies of
Hi all,
I've been using TB! IMAP quite comfortably. However, I'm now having an
Inbox problem that doesn't seem to affect other mailboxes. I'm therefore
considering a workaround. It's then that it struck me that I use a lot
of workarounds with TB!. I'll list them here so that others and the
--On 2/07/2005 08:23 -0500 Allie wrote:
However, with all that, I still somewhat prefer what it's doing now to
Mulberry
I admire your tenacity, Allie. How much of a bat masochist can you become
before you start screaming?
As far as I'm concerened TB! has become like a Ming vase - something
Hi Allie,
On Saturday, 02 Juli 2005 at 3:23 PM you (Allie Martin) wrote:
- I avoid working with large mailboxes, i.e., no more than 4000 messages
per mailbox. This may be even less if I end up having say 5 or more
folders with a large amount of messages.
That's right. The same applies for
On Saturday, July 02, 2005 at 10:52:29 AM [GMT -0500], Manuel Breitfeld
wrote:
What's so curious about your inbox? Why does it differ from other
folders? And what works better with an empty inbox?
It's a curious problem.
- I start TB! and there are for example 5 messages in the Inbox.
- I
Hi Allie Martin
-
On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, at 08:23:10 [GMT -0500] (which was 6:23 AM where I
live) you wrote:
After a long absence, I decided to play with the latest build of TB.
To my surprise, it appears to be significantly more robust that any
previous
Hello Manuel,
Saturday, July 2, 2005, 10:52:29 AM, you wrote:
- I don't filter much with TB!
I filter nothing with TB!, because that's one of the things that brought me
many duplicates...
IMAP us good because when I read mail at home and some at the office,
and some on the road. It's nice
Hello Allie,
Saturday, July 2, 2005, 11:56:55 AM, you wrote:
- I start TB! and there are for example 5 messages in the Inbox.
- I select the Inbox and start reading/deleting mail.
- The Inbox counts do not reflect the changes even though the deleted
messages disappear from the list and the
On Saturday, July 02, 2005 at 8:37:19 PM [GMT -0500], Dwight A Corrin
wrote:
Why this has to do with the filtering topic is that I have tried using
TB! filters and they only filter at the inbox, and only when one opens
the inbox. Therefore, if one creates filters to move mail at home,
that
On Saturday, July 02, 2005 at 8:38:33 PM [GMT -0500], Dwight A Corrin
wrote:
do you ever get to negative numbers, such as -7?
No. I've managed to get to a -3. :)
I see this when I'm browsing and marking messages read when the message
count is reasserting itself. Usually, the counter goes to 1
On Saturday, July 02, 2005 at 2:10:09 PM [GMT -0500], Kevin Amazon
wrote:
- I no longer use the ticker. I may revisit this since I haven't tried
it in a long time.
I use it. It works fine
Really? I just tried it and have to assume that you use it only as an
indicator that new messages have
26 matches
Mail list logo
