Re: PGP bug revisited

2004-10-15 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Dierk, On Friday, October 15, 2004 at 7:54:52 AM Dierk [DH] wrote: I don't use any batpgp65.dll, only The Bat! internal support for all PGP versions and all characters are properly decoded after encryption. DH I'll try it; can't remember exactly why I chose Imad's plug-in, DH perhaps

Re: PGP bug revisited

2004-10-15 Thread Hendrik Oesterlin
Peter Palmreuther wrotes on 15/10/2004 at 17:34:02 +1100 subject PGP bug revisited : @Hendrik: could you try to rename the DDL's you're writing about and test if PGP integration still works? It really should :-) Yes, as I use actually PGP-8.1 use the PGP 5,6,7,8 (build-in support). I can

Re: PGP bug revisited

2004-10-15 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Peter! On Friday, October 15, 2004 at 8:34:02 AM you wrote: I think you got confused by Zygmunt writing internal, but I guess he intended to say build-in, as this would be correct. That may be. Since I was writing about an installation of CKT ... You *need* to have PGP or GnuPG

PGP bug revisited

2004-10-14 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello TBBETA Members! Anybody remember the problem where CKT versions of PGP didn't correctly decode special characters, like German umlauts becoming Hex-code? Quick rehash: CKT builds are usable with TB via plug-in; there has been one way back by RL, which was later superseded by one

Re: PGP bug revisited

2004-10-14 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Thursday, October 14, 2004, at 19:54:31 [UTC+0200] (Thursday, October 14, 2004 19:54 my local time) Dierk Haasis wrote: Anybody remember the problem where CKT versions of PGP didn't correctly decode special characters, like German umlauts becoming Hex-code? Hmmm... I use last build

Re: PGP bug revisited

2004-10-14 Thread David Elliott
Hello TBBETA, The ancient mystics foretold that on 14 October 2004, at 19:54:31 +0200 (which was 18:54 where I live) Dierk Haasis emanated these words of wisdom Anybody remember the problem where CKT versions of PGP didn't correctly decode special characters, like German umlauts becoming

Re: PGP bug revisited

2004-10-14 Thread Miroslav Florensen
Hello Zygmunt, Hmmm... I use last build of Imad's PGP (6.5.8CKT9b2) and all 8-bit characters are correctly decoded. also here with the 'normal' PGP6.5.8 Version, with and without MIME. -- best regards Miroslav BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu News-Ticker:

Re: PGP bug revisited

2004-10-14 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Zygmunt! On Thursday, October 14, 2004 at 8:51:36 PM you wrote: Hmmm... I use last build of Imad's PGP (6.5.8CKT9b2) and all 8-bit characters are correctly decoded. Interesting, I am using exactly the same version and even the blank in signature delimiters gets converted to =20, it was

Re: PGP bug revisited

2004-10-14 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Dierk! On Thursday, October 14, 2004 at 9:23:37 PM you wrote: Interesting, I am using exactly the same version and even the blank in signature delimiters gets converted to =20, it was I think. Hm, may the setting in Account properties how to handle 8-bit characters be related? Mine is

Re: PGP bug revisited

2004-10-14 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Thursday, October 14, 2004, at 21:34:54 [UTC+0200] (Thursday, October 14, 2004 21:34 my local time) Dierk Haasis wrote: Interesting, I am using exactly the same version and even the blank in signature delimiters gets converted to =20, it was I think. Hm, may the setting in Account

Re: PGP bug revisited

2004-10-14 Thread Chris Wilson
Thursday, October 14, 2004, 8:09:45 PM, you wrote: Hello Zygmunt, Hmmm... I use last build of Imad's PGP (6.5.8CKT9b2) and all 8-bit characters are correctly decoded. also here with the 'normal' PGP6.5.8 Version, with and without MIME. -- Best regards, Chris Wilson

Re: PGP bug revisited

2004-10-14 Thread Hendrik Oesterlin
Dierk Haasis wrotes on 15/10/2004 at 04:54:31 +1100 subject PGP bug revisited : Quick rehash: CKT builds are usable with TB via plug-in; there are different versions of this batpgp65.dll file. The one I used without any problem of this kind has this checksum: 83B94A66 There is an other

Re: PGP bug revisited

2004-10-14 Thread Nick Andriash
On 14-Oct-2004 12:34:54, Dierk wrote: Hm, may the setting in Account properties how to handle 8-bit characters be related? Mine is Quoted Printable ... I would definitely change that option Dierk to Without Changes. ~Nick Andriash~ Creston, B.C. Canada

Re: PGP bug revisited

2004-10-14 Thread Zygmunt Wereszczynski
On Thursday, October 14, 2004, at 08:03:11 [UTC+1100] (Thursday, October 14, 2004 23:03 my local time) Hendrik Oesterlin wrote: Quick rehash: CKT builds are usable with TB via plug-in; there are different versions of this batpgp65.dll file. The one I used without any problem of this kind

Re: PGP bug revisited

2004-10-14 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Zygmunt! On Thursday, October 14, 2004 at 11:46:08 PM you wrote: I don't use any batpgp65.dll, only The Bat! internal support for all PGP versions and all characters are properly decoded after encryption. I'll try it; can't remember exactly why I chose Imad's plug-in, perhaps because